Bluedell 6,351 Posted Thursday at 15:29 Share Posted Thursday at 15:29 22 minutes ago, buster. said: I'd be more concerned with the new Articles of Association that the consortium want to bring in and the reduction in transparency. Why are you concerned about the new articles? Presumably the new ones will be the model articles, unless you know something different? What reduction in transparency? Being a PLC costs more and makes it more difficult to issue shares. Also I'm not sure why you raised the points in this thread. A statement about a SFA fine has got nothing to do with our corporate arrangements. We can have a view on the statement independent of the points you raise. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Gonzo79 15,630 Posted Thursday at 16:05 Popular Post Share Posted Thursday at 16:05 Good statement. Nothing wrong with Brown stating that opinion on RTV. The SFA can GTF. 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whosthedado 1,898 Posted Thursday at 16:06 Share Posted Thursday at 16:06 Just now, Gonzo79 said: Good statement. Nothing wrong with Brown stating that opinion on RTV. The SFA can GTF. Bang on. Was literally typing something along these exact lines 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post CammyF 9,762 Posted Thursday at 16:15 Popular Post Share Posted Thursday at 16:15 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JohnMc 3,320 Posted Thursday at 16:34 Popular Post Share Posted Thursday at 16:34 I'm surprised the club thinks there's a lack of consistency. The authorities are very consistent, they'll ignore anything awkward from any other member except Rangers, they've been consistent with this for years. 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
L72 546 Posted Thursday at 16:43 Author Share Posted Thursday at 16:43 1 hour ago, Student said: I agree but Brown's comment was unnecessary, could have used the word 'incompetent' for example. I think even if he had said that, the SFA would've levelled the same charge at us. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ready1314 169 Posted Thursday at 17:03 Share Posted Thursday at 17:03 47 minutes ago, CammyF said: Nailed it . 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Moon 1,690 Posted Thursday at 17:05 Share Posted Thursday at 17:05 (edited) They've made a rod for their own back here. Edited Thursday at 17:35 by Blue Moon 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
L72 546 Posted Thursday at 17:10 Author Share Posted Thursday at 17:10 4 minutes ago, Blue Moon said: They've made a rod or their own back here. Essentially, they need to monitor and punish every other Scottish football club for similar, every match published on that clubs media channels. That's a lot of review and punishments. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranger_syntax 5,006 Posted Thursday at 17:21 Share Posted Thursday at 17:21 47 minutes ago, JohnMc said: I'm surprised the club thinks there's a lack of consistency. The authorities are very consistent, they'll ignore anything awkward from any other member except Rangers, they've been consistent with this for years. It's not hypocrisy; it's hierarchy. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.