wabashcannonball

What surprises me, is that a great many bears if not the majority in other places, are shying away from any tangible support for the refs, the only tangible support I can see is for the fans to petition the club(s) to refuse to play, and fek the consequences, the consequences of selik being seen to use regan for their own ends will be far greater.

Make no mistake, the taarriers are celebrating the news as if the ROI had won the world cup. ETA..........the refs themselves have no objection to other refs taking the games, I am of the opinion that they never thought anyone would take them, so the idea of registering an objection was never considered.

The new year game is of little importance in the overall picture, it is only a game in many, as it is every year, having for me lost some of its tradition by altering the date, again kow-towing to the easily offended. If the taarriers suffer no retribution from this chain of events, Scottish fitba is truly on its death bed.

If the games go ahead with scab refs and teams involved including us concur with the use of scab refs, the mhanks have got what they want, ironic isn't it, we and others are advancing seliks power, by blunting a point that was made by refs to bring the problem of the mhanks to a head and be dealt with.

The question is, what does the Catholic church have to do with Celtic or Scottish football. Celtic continually tell us they are non denominational.

Paranoia as defined by the taarriers. http://tinyurl.com/242jt92

Dallas is an employee of the SFA I believe, the refs are merely self employed advisor's, not affected by strike/withdrawal of labour law.

The only meaningful incentive would have been punitive action against ra selik, this is a straight fight as to who runs Scotlands game, ra selik and their puppet regan, or the SFA. Regan appears to be unfit for purpose, a favoured expression of his master Dr Death.

You may be right Bluedell, that would be David Smith the depute chairman and infamous for the Cambuslang debacle, ousted by the bunnet. I have heard several versions of his persuasion, atheist/high anglican and Jesuit moulded, but have never ever found a definitive, it was the VB article of some time ago that stirred my curiosity, as he was claimed to be the first non RC director in 106 years. So as always I am open to correction and booted baws, if he was indeed the first.

I am utterly amazed that no one anywhere has mentioned the elephant in Celtic's boardroom, or Glasgow Celtic to give them their proper name, not Belfast not Dublin, not Letterkenny, just Glasgow Celtic. Glasgow Celtic appear to be selective in their appraisal of that which is acceptable and non acceptable religious discrimination, will they ask the Catholic or rather Roman Catholic church to call for the sacking of Zander Diamond and others, who used sectarian expressions to convey very public jokes, about Protestants. However my main point is that Glasgow Celtic practise the religious bigotry that they so publicly condemn, in the heart of their own boardroom, the late and great Jock Stein was denied a directorship, for no other reason than he was a Mason and a Protestant, just like six of the Lisbon Lions. How long will our own club allow Celtic to take the hypocritical high ground, before they defend our club, our way of life, and our supporters. I invite you Martin Bain to do your job for which you are so vastly overpaid, and ask the direct question as to who was Celtics last or first non RC director/board member. The answer should be interesting.

Bain/kerr/uefa are the best employees selik have, they should be worrying about these feks and taking action against them, rather than pissin in our pool about a fekkin song.

Other places are on suicide watch, Regan has come out on the side of the taarriers, what a shower of feckin drama queens. The guy made a statement about sectarianism in general in Scottish football, see if you agree. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/scotland/9219911.stm

ETA....ffs keep losing bits of posts, missing bit....Grandson said earlier tonight, no deal bank not interested. So we shall see what transpires. The thing that pisses me off is the hootsmon having tea and crumpets with Minty, the end result being a stick for the ****s to prod us with, when we were well on top in every department...

I can see we are going into denial again, AJ had/has the remit to find a buyer, if you think or anyone thinks that it is protocol to keep him and the COE out of the loop with regard to "talks" with an alleged billionaire, who is anything but, carry on, you will probably end up with the owner you deserve.......Minty.

From what I was told at lunch time it is no more than a bag of spanners wrapped up in a kite. Ellis is not involved, Mr Traynor got the wrong Liberty company the SA one, of which Martin Ellis is construction director, put two and two together and got �£33 mill. Also was said that neither AJ nor Bain or the inclusive board had any knowledge of any "talks".

There is an article Sunday Mirror, January 27, 2008. which will tell what anyone really should know. If anything the reporting, investigative lack of or otherwise, has been even worse than the Ellis fiasco, I really didn't think that was possible.

FWIW, I am sure Bluedell has more than the expertise required to make a valued judgement on the circumstances of Mr Whyte, the link gives enough to do the required tracing, not very good reading. http://www.companiesintheuk.co.uk/ltd/tixway-uk

See it's all kicking off again, so I will have my say and leave it, not got the inclination to go down a blind alley. Grandson reckons figures are out by a factor of three, taking into consideration the club has very manageable short and long term debt, also the clubs obvious property and other assets portfolio. Whyte has had to say the least a very chequered career, quite a few companies having gone under, always someone elses fault. The company named as the main player, Liberty, is loosely called a turnaround specialist, actually they are more asset strippers, why we would need a turnaround specialist, when we have Muir begs a question. I will wait and see same as everyone else, but it looks like another florida/ellis shitfest, enjoy.

Unequivocal with his statement, more or less, move along nothing to see, tarrieers away scot free. Years of more of the same to come, no wonder Smith baled.

Assessors report enjoy. http://tinyurl.com/34bdx42

You don't have a point to miss.

Now there is the rub, you don't know and I don't know, but there again our fans are an easier target than the taarriers.......... maybe because the taarriers board fights their corner, right or wrong, if only Bain had the same backing to give us....

They would have to prove that first, natural justice and all that.........

Reagan has an easy answer to his present and future ref problems, caused by the *******s, convince his bosses to revert to the old system, refs decision is final and fuk all these panels and appeals crap, some you win some you lose, that is how the cookie crumbles. One thing is for certain in the days of Walker/Farry, this shit would never have seen the light of day, the *******s wouldn't even have tried it, cracked down on right away.