wabashcannonball

You mean Boyd didn't get more than plenty ?, whats that egg on your coupon....

You will be able to say that and make sense..........after we win more trophies with this team than we did when he was here. Until then your contribution is mere speculation.

Some really need to catch on, Boyd owes us and owed us fuk all, �£400,000 we got the bargain, the treatment and vitriol aimed his way makes me wonder about some fuds allegiances at times, he may have to prove himself all over again down south, but up here the alltime SPL hitman has fuk all to prove..........to anyone.

UEFA have no jurisdiction in the Scottish SPL or leagues, any action would have to come from indigenous associations, that will not happen.

Whither it is or was a penalty is immaterial, the only person who matters is the guy who gives the decision the ref. He clearly saw the incident, he decided, we benefited from his decision. If you really want to see a bad penalty decision have a look at last nights Sevilla v Bilboa game, I really don't believe I have seen a worse decision in a long long time, even the commentators stated that.

Penalty !!!!............ http://willievass.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/241010-Celtic-v-Rangers/G0000APntnfTRbk8/I00001.MWlwvLqUE ETA. for those under the mistaken impression that the ref never saw the "incident".

Good bad or not as good is the fulcrum, for my part I do not believe that foreign teams are as good or super good as the media would have us believe, I backed my judgement with hard cash at the start of the CL, as some of you may remember. Our league while not the greatest still plays to the same rules as any other league, at the end of the day it is 11 on the field against 11, if we don't let the opposition play they don't play, but sometimes shit happens and sometimes it is all roses, rocket science it aint.

See above.

P1 and P2, and not an Almoner nor Worshipful Master on the square. A secret is only a secret if it is a secret.

For myself, being taught caution at all times, I would say it is nothing more than paranoid bollox, isn't that the preserve of those over at mordor....

Rangers appeal upheld UEFA's Appeals Body has today partially upheld the appeal made against the Control and Disciplinary Body's decision concerning Scottish club Rangers FC and their UEFA Champions League first knockout round tie against Villarreal CF. Rangers fined UEFA appealed against the decision on 12 April by the Control and Disciplinary Body to find Rangers not guilty of alleged discriminatory chants by the club's supporters at both legs of the tie, on 22 February at Ibrox and 7 March at El Madrigal. Rangers have been fined €19,500 and severely warned about their responsibility for any future misconduct by their fans in relation to sectarian and discriminatory behaviour. Future directives In addition, the Appeals Body will combine the disciplinary measures with directives safeguarding the correct execution of the judgement. The directives themselves will be communicated to Rangers along with the full written grounds for the disciplinary decision. http://en.uefa.com/uefa/footballfirst/matchorganisation/disciplinary/news/newsid=414229.html#uefa+appeal+rangers+verdict

Reasons for Rangers decision UEFA has issued the reasoning behind its disciplinary decision against Scottish club Rangers FC, announced yesterday. Fined for incidents The European body fined Rangers FC €13,000 for incidents at their UEFA Champions League first knockout round tie against Spanish outfit Villarreal CF last month. Crowd disturbances UEFA's Control and Disciplinary Body imposed the fine on Rangers following the improper conduct of some of their supporters, notably the smashing of a window of the Villarreal team bus at the second-leg match in Spain on 7 March. Not guilty The body declared the Rangers fans not guilty of alleged discriminatory chants at both legs of the tie, which Villarreal won on the away-goals rule after the two sides had finished 3-3 on aggregate. The body’s decision can be appealed against within three days. Social problem In examining the alleged discriminatory chants, the Control & Disciplinary Body admitted that the nature of the song concerned – “Billy Boys” - related to a social problem in Scotland. The body also believed that the disciplinary decision in this case had to be taken in the context of Scotland’s social and historical background. Studied evidence After studying the evidence at hand as well as the statement of Rangers FC, the Control & Disciplinary Body conceded that supporters have been singing the song "Billy Boys" for years during national and international matches without either the Scottish football or governmental authorities being able to intervene. The result is that this song is now somehow tolerated. Social and historical context Given this social and historical context, the Control & Disciplinary Body said it considered that UEFA cannot demand an end to behaviour which has been tolerated for years. In view of the above, the Control & Disciplinary Body ruled that, despite the behaviour of its supporters, Rangers FC had not infringed Article 5 of the UEFA Disciplinary Regulations (click here) and cannot be punished according to Article 6. http://tinyurl.com/2cjuop9

Certain places of an indifferent nature are steering clear of baldy bain's inflammatory utterances, could these "places" be the complainants. Sing it loud and sing it proud..........

Bulleted from hibs, mutual consent my arse.... who is nexy magoo must be fav. http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/sport1/hi/football/teams/h/hibernian/9057294.stm

Physical cos they run aboot chasin the baw like weans up the park :fish: , mibees they should heed the words of the great man Shanks..................."let the baw dae the work" :spl: An how more demanding does a gemme last 4 hours or something noo, or is it still two halfs of 45 min......

You sure ?? is it no hauncuffs.....:spl:

Fekin haunbags at 40 paces more like.... :box::box::box::box:

How is more physical, you aint allowed to tackle and the majority o the fairies couldny tackle a fish supper ????

What debate, I must have missed it, plenty of mud slinging, innuendo and unsubstantiated allegations, not one iota of anything concrete or substantive.....are we any further forward...we all know the answer to that.

FFS make up yir fekin mind, dae yee want links or dae yee no want links, come the glorious day.....

Bring on Spaniards by the score Barcelona, Real Madrid they will make a gallant bid For we're out to show the world what we can do................ :spl::spl::spl:

A few shifts humping 8x4's, roof tiles, bricks or fire doors, is what these self centred complaining pussies need, they just might realise they get payed for doing fuk all......except playing a game

Man City's published accounts take some believing, even if they are well published. http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/Club-news/2010/October/~/media/Files/Club/MCFC%20Annual%20Report%20200910.ashx

NO it wouldn't be telling, it is making an unsubstantiated statement on a message board, which is what you have done, standard practise for the whole sorry affair.