the gunslinger

oh Sinclair must go that's for sure.

at 106 million is throw 56 at the gers easy. then get houses all over the shop with another 20 the rest in the bank to live off the interest.

Hoping a bid built on debt fails. yeah I kind of do.

if green wasn't demanding to be repaid his 8 million I could support him.

add in the interest and no doubt any working capital he actually puts in and we will be back to square one.

only difference is instead of paying lloyds we will be paying green.

what I really hope is that he fails soon before its too late. their will come a point where he's the lesser of two evils pretty soon.

with 97 plus million you could spunk a lot on a football club and still be very very rich.

green makes tbk look like the sultan of Brunei.

tbk wanted to do this. my understanding is any owner will have to. or prize money will be withheld

Did I read somewhere that a Scottish Cup ban could imperil the CVA? If so how come?

it can if green wants it to.

one of the clauses is that we must be in all competitions or green can pull out.

I would be suspicious if he did because of something so small.

given the sfas qc has already stated that certain punishments were to harsh if they impose those the court case surrounding that should be short but sweet.

no wonder its a risk free investment.

the fans will pay you back with interest.

frankly its a bad sign green can't sell it more easily.

though Freddy will be lucky to last till 2020.

How much did that win?

19 quid.

I had two winning lines out of 5 for about 25 quid back from my tenner.

I got 2 numbers and both lucky stars.

so he actually likes the idea its not a computer thing.

can't see how he would survive this.

the club must complain.

how are favorite tweets decided on?

I have money for a season book set asside the right owner acting in the correct fashion will get my support.

Did Leggat actually write that article? It's a big improvement on anything else he's written on this subject.

he's up and down. probably a side affect of it being a daily blog.

Is it right that the appeal panel can't give out a harsher punishment?

they can raise or lower the punishment.

green is potless. we will ne back in admin or costs will be halved.

Wasn't it the original panel who said that they considered termination too harsh?

 

Glennie sent it back to the Appellate Panel and listed the sanctions open to them.

they did agree with the original panel.

the sfa by saying its going to pick a New sanction is pre determining our case.

what about the fine they can give us?

they have already fined us the maximum.

but they can chose not to punish us further or for that matter to punish us less.

they do not need to punish us more.

Bill Miller could easily have decided that himself. It is the most obvious option after a CVA.

independently to d&p thinking it up.

seems far fetched.

a good journo takes any source and checks it thoroughly.

Muir thought it up I imagine.

can we afford new signs?

No thanks.

I think he's a good player at the kind of price he will be.