RANGERRAB

LOL. The only reason they're reviewing this legislation is that it is proving that the yahoos are the worst offenders & are the ones getting caught by it. Had it been us nothing would be getting done. Scotland 2015.

If HMRC wanted to nail Whyte they could have done so before he got Rangers. They didnt. Why not?

Yes I think there's every possibility they will get it right. Appoint Warburton & Weir.

And speaking to a Motherwell supporter at work this seemed to be something McCall often tried to do i.e. Defending a lead with defensive substitutions

Next week will be a defining moment for the new board with this managerial appointment. It must be an appointment which will drastically improve things on the park mostly by virtue of the signings he makes. For that reason alone the board simply cannot get this appointment wrong

Unfortunately I do not believe a word of what HMRC say. Whyte took over in May 2011 but emerged as a potential buyer about six months previously IIRC. He was allegedly looking thro the books(aye right) We have since learned that Whyte already owed HMRC about 3million in taxes prior to him getting Rangers.So why did HMRC just sit back & allow him to take over Rangers ? If they were so concerned why let him run up even more tax than he already owed HMRC? HMRC then laughably claimed they didnt know Whyte was back in the country when he emerged six months before he got Rangers. Who's kidding who here? Dont they talk to UKborder control? Or are they not as competent as the Mexican authorities who arrested Whyte last year as he tried to sneak back to Costa Rica? Nope IMO HMRC were manipulated by poltical influence to try & financially destroy Rangers by firstly inventing a BTC to deter reputable buyers and secondly allowing Whyte to take over and cause even more carnage. A certain gentleman who presided as east end chairman now sitting in the lords is my main suspect. Ibelieve in the fullness of time this will all come out.

Very interesting question indeed.

Regards HMRC losing at the Court of Session ? Is the next stage not then the Court of Appeal? Assuming they go that far with this nonsense. They've lost. Just can't accept it in case the whole story then comes out

I'm not at all convinced Cathro is in the running for the job even as an assistant.

Sure i wasnt just a few bitter timz ? More than plenty to choose from in this vile nation of ours.

What is now very apparent is that without the BTC the oldco was never insolvent.

By not repaying it he will argue they've not got the funds they're made out to have. Reluctantly I'd tend to agree as per the stuff about getting 45k ST holders for next season. No chance

I've not heard Kennedy's name mentioned recently that's why. I genuinely do not believe the names you mentioned(including King) are as wealthy as you would like us to believe and Ashley is going all out to prove this with Rangers being the losers

Paul Murray ? Don't think so. Letham doubtful too. And Park is wealthy but certainly nowhere near billionaire class you mentioned

who are they then? name names

if u read what I said no I'm not happy but as I said we need to be told the exact details. No more speculation. I also want to know what Ashley wants from Rangers. We must be small beer to him. Why is he involved? All he is getting is bad publicity. Is that what he wants ? Wouldn't think so

Don't suppose they could spare a few million between them for some decent players for next season then ?? If they're as wealthy as you say

that cannot be allowed to happen.

We need to know exact details of the SD commercial contracts to end all this speculation because that's what it is.

How rich then?

who are very rich men?

I think you've hit the nail on the head. I genuinely believe Ashley doesnt think King & T3B have the funds. Whether he is correct or not remains to be seen.

I only got a ST last season after a ten year absence

Because he is the main creditor

If the terms of the loan have been broken regarding the 2 directors would that be enough to give him the right to demand repayment? Without seeing the terms of the loan agreement we are speculating.