jhunter

My mistake i misread Murray Group Management Ltd for Murray Management Group Ltd from here https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/judgments/hmrc-v-murray-group-holdings-ltd-and-others/

Murray Group Management Ltd. THAT murray? and THAT charles green? who'd have thought it eh?

Does the defendent MIH have the right to appeal this decision?

I would imagine its re heard with shit like this presented as evidence.

it will rev up the Rangers cheated campaign and have the vermin foaming at the mouth wanting tiles removed.

he wants to contrate on himself his form has been abysmal recently.

it will be a lot earlier than that when these fraud trials are conducted.

No and educate your kids as to why.

ill phil and related bampots with nowhere left to go cretins

Ally maxwell it was horrific watching him.

an absolutely ridiculous assertion laughable.

great article astonished its in the ET

who wrote green's contract? imran ahmad? the case will take about 4 minutes and the judge will be pissing himself laughing. i fully expect green to fake a heart attack

they'll all go when their contracts expire next summer nowhere near what is needed going forward from there.

Thomas MCPHEE who is this? Related to our case?? different case number, he gets his 15 minutes of fame

king has stated time and again any shortfall will be covered by himself/the 3 bears until a share issue can happen and they get their loans turned into shares. this presumably will be part of the 30M investment he promised to make its only utter fannies/celtc supporting vermin who continue to spout shite about Rangers finances.

if the judge doesn't laugh in his puss the country's legal system should be put down.

does that salary figure include bonuses for winning the third division?

It will be one of the most fascinating seasons in our history.

who at the club is going to sue ally mccoist?

from whom?

1:21 onward , how unlucky was that move not to end in a goal? superb football

Superb stuff again total dominance, exquisite goals

Superb piece, love the rat analogy.

there are sound files/ pdf documents, emails , hours of discussions dating back years already online that could "prejudice" the case.