Jump to content

 

 

Rangersitis

  • Posts

    3,601
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rangersitis

  1. Quite a bit of it is down to the constant bitching from other interested parties.
  2. Most of them just have a deep hatred of Messrs. Dingwall, Graham, Houston etc.
  3. Looking back at the reasons the judges gave for declining the two previous attempts, he has a great chance of being successful on this occasion.
  4. Not hire yet another suit for the PR department. Get rid of all the players that the manager had no intention of using. Not buy any more players for an already bloated squad. Get in the investment that was claimed to be available. Refrain from lying to the support about there being enough cash until season end. Manage to read from the same script where the threat of administration was concerned. I'm positive that there are plenty more that I have missed.
  5. It was known since mid-December that a ST boycott was on the cards, and the damage that could do was acknowledged by Sandy Easdale. Would it not have been prudent for them to be proactive way back then?
  6. No, and I really don't see how you would get that from what I posted. There is no way that any of those you mentioned would get anywhere near the board while the controlling shareholders remain.
  7. The low attendances are doing the job. The new owners could be the same owners as we have now if they have it planned that way. It would be up to the support to ensure that wasn't an option for them.
  8. My opinion is that they will eventually do what you say no matter what the support does now or in the future. That being the case, a quick end to their reign will be less costly and with no lingering pain.
  9. Season ticket. The clue is in the name.
  10. 1. That remains to be seen. 2. You can't lose what you never had. 3. Who DK uses as a conduit for his words is solely a matter for him. 4. People are capable of making their own choices on attendance.
  11. Well the ticket sales were at their highest at the beginning when the trimming should have been done. We would all prefer to see nobody losing their livelihood, but it was nothing more than a facade. Keeping the staffing levels as they were was all to do with getting the mugs to think "Everything must be ok if there are no redundancies". Meanwhile, backstage..... My worry if there is another administration is that there will be a repeat of the previous stitch-up and the same mob will be back for seconds.
  12. Spot on. The excessive salaries of the management team and the players falls to the suits too. They are the ones tasked with running things within budget.
  13. Cheers, Frankie. The story is behind the paywall, so can't work out what it could be about.
  14. What's with the Herald story about Graham Wallace not participating in the share offer? Does he even have any shares?
  15. Will any of the loanees return in the January window for the title run-in? Discuss.
  16. They did lose, but I haven't seen anyone suggesting that a full team of twenty year olds are introduced in the first year of the top league. The development should have begun in the bottom tier and been tweaked as things progressed. Nothing will change now.
  17. Alexander Wallace Cribari Perry (Argiriou) Hegarty Hutton (McKay) Black Macleod Shiels (Kyle) McCulloch Little That would be himself and McKay, thanks mainly to his Morton loan spell. Sounds like club PR bullshit. Was Macleod even present for this interview or did Dickson write it and get the ET to print it?
  18. They lost to a club which promotes it's younger talent into the first team - their starting line-up on Saturday, in the higher division, averaged a full three years less than McCoist's side against QOS. The motivation to succeed goes a long, long way when there is a carrot dangled.
  19. The club ethos. Handed down from Smith to McCoist and implemented further down the chain.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.