Rousseau

At least Hagi exists...

There needs to be someone in place before the end of the international break.

Yes, good names, but their success comes either in the Netherlands or Barcelona - which, thanks to Cruyff, is basically Dutch in terms of the players and set-up at their disposal. Koeman didn't win much outside the Netherlands. (He had Southampton doing well, but that was on the back of Pochettino's work, IMO.) Hiddink is a good manager, but again didn't actually win much outside the Netherlands.

He's also Dutch, but that's a personal prejudice.

Aris Limassol 0 - 1 Rangers FGS Tavernier

Aris Limassol vs Rangers

Maybe in the past.

It's not enough now. The game has moved on.

Are you... feeling alright?

So... Pep?

For me, the only criteria is an ability to implement an effective style of play. That doesn't mean fancy - Conte's style is quite dull, but it's effective. (Not that I'm saying Conte is an option, either.) I would rule out anyone that hasn't done it at at least two/three clubs. Potter, Hasenhuttl, Knutsen (successful rebuilds rather than another club), Bielsa and even Marsch fit the bill, for me. I'm doubtful of Muscat just because he has only done it following Ange - can he implement that style himself, from scratch? I don't know. He failed in Belgium.

What does everyone mean by 'experience'? Longevity in the game or trophies won.

Scottish coaches are rubbish; all they know how to do is organise and defend. Football tactics have passed them by.

This will be overshadowed somewhat, but... What are your thoughts, folks?

Muscat just has success when he follows Ange. I have this sneaking suspicion that he won't be able to implement that style from scratch.

Outside Cruyff - and maybe Van Gaal - I've always thought this.

It stays open until I get the result I want!

Not the main issue. I don't think they're bad players, but the way they're used just doesn't make the most of them - I keep saying Lammers is wasted as a #10. Whether that's enough to win the league, I don't know. I was just responding to those saying we need to get away from one up top, when we've not played one up top for ages - and in fact, we've played with three forwards quite often.

I like a few names. Others... nope!

Perhaps - I mean, he's probably made his money already.

3,4,5,7 and 11 are acceptable to me.

No.

He's just a caretaker.

I used 'literally' on another thread earlier. Do I get a pass?