I don't think it matters too much where he's signing players (he may have contacts, but it will be mainly through Antwerp's scouting network; if we don't have a network in SA it won't matter).
What matters is how well he's signed first-team players and their increase in value.
The Everton run-in is interesting.
They have Chelsea, Liverpool and Arsenal which you wouldn't expect much from, but their other games are all against teams around the relegation zone: Luton, Sheffield Utd, Forrrrrrest and Brentford.
Eminently winnable, but also quite dangerous.
Dermot couldn't bring himself to say so, but his explanation suggests that he thought it was virtually re-refereeing the game, which should not be (is not?) allowed. It's the subjectivity of where the phase of play ends and begins.
Of course, with the standard of our referees it's going to go against us.
(He did think - as we all do - that it was a foul, but the referee played on in the moment.)
I don't think it does, because of the goal. Don't quote me on that, though - I'll wait for Dermot.
The referee may have seen it, but he did make the wrong decision as it was a foul. That is a clear and obvious error. That's just my opinion.
Yes, for me, I think the length of time between the plays is the issue. If VAR have got it wrong, that will be where it is.
I think they go back to it because the end result was a goal, even if the referee did see it.
I'll wait for Dermot at 11:00 before speculating, though.
We've broken the 100 point mark.
Correct Result (1 pt): BD, Mal, compo, Devil and Franc.
Correct Number of Rangers Goals (1pt): FA, MacK, Graeme, Ian and FS.
FGS (2 pts): Rousseau, BD, FA, Franc and FS.
Correct Score (3 pts): -
Latest Standings:
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.