CammyF

Think we've all been sent that list ? According to Glasgow Live and Daily Record (I know) only 1 or 2 confirmed positive with more awaiting results (close contacts of the two positive cases). We'll know soon enough when the squad fly out tomorrow.

Bookies now slashing odds on Celtic for Sunday. No real surprise as they'll be following the money and protecting themselves from taking a hammering. Might stick 50p in Rangers at 15/8.

Team for Thursday and Sunday been leaked

GDPR? Heard Celtic have allegedly also had a positive case but not been released / reported.

From Glasgow Live ; The Ibrox side have confirmed three positive tests among the players and coaching staff while several more will have to isolate.

Was bound to happen, but couldn't have come at a worse time.

So they went to arbitration as they weren't aware of their own rule regarding conflict of interest in sponsorship. Then lose a court ruling as they weren't aware of their own rules regarding arbitration. Wow, these guys are beyond incompetent.

I am no legal expert but Parks must have shown sufficient evidence that they have a contract with us which causes a conflict to be "invited" to the arbitration ?‍♂️

OK 1-0 Parks Of Hamilton, but given our statement, I'd say we've also nicked a lead over the cabal.

As do I, never applied for an away allocation and haven't joined MyGers. Only ever go to away games if my RSC are stuck with tickets which would leave them out of pocket. That will not happen now MyGers members will sweep up the vast majority of away tickets

Maybe have saved your money and purchased MyGers instead if that was the case. No issues with away tickets then. However, back in reality, the RSC in question is from an area where there are numerous other RSC whom I'm sure will welcome new members with open arms.

https://www.rangers.co.uk/Article/club-statement-230821-2/2vCLP2ai73xhkUiaRbR4a4 TODAY'S court ruling once again underlines ongoing concerns regarding the corporate governance and leadership of the SPFL. These concerns are shared by many of the SPFL’s member clubs. We have complied with the SPFL’s own rules but today’s court hearing was one that could easily have been avoided if those responsible had adopted a more consensual and less confrontational approach. The Executive of the SPFL required to carry out effective due diligence before entering into its contract with the new league sponsor. Instead, an inadequate and antagonistic approach appears to have been adopted; one that it is hard to imagine is in the best interests of the SPFL’s member clubs.

Or simply move to another RSC? It's as simple as turning up, paying your membership and hey presto, you're a member.

1-0 Rangers ?

If they are MyGers members they'll be fine.

The way I read it, the RSC hasn't been banned, just won't receive any tickets. If it's anything like my RSC the vast majority of members are ST holders so little or no impact on home games. For away tickets, our RSC is category A+ and received 1 ticket for yesterday's game. Very little impact on the RSC if I've read the statement correctly.

Went for Aribo but thought Kamara was excellent also.

Take a draw on Thursday if it meant a win on Sunday ?

Barisic is struggling with an injury and a short pre-season, completely different from Tav / Patterson scenario. The manager has shown he'll play Patterson when Tav us unavailable. He also reacted to the £5M bid by laughing it off, shows he rates Patterson very highly. Remember it wasn't long ago that the likes of Bates and McCorrie were being touted as future Rangers and Scotland captains. BTW, I rate Patterson as the best prospect we've had since Barry Ferguson.

Why shut it down if you are developing players clubs are bidding £5M for a product of that department How can you sell a player there is no interest in? Or do you suggest dropping Tav to accommodate a raw youngster? Tav is superior to Patterson at the moment, his stats last season were off the charts and he is Club Captain

For those advocating selling Tav, we need a buyer to sell him to and whilst Patterson is an exciting prospect, that's all he is at the moment. He is nowhere near Tav stat wise and our business model requires us to sell players at a profit. There is interest in Patterson and none in Tav so realistically we can only sell Patterson (as it stands).

Three consecutive wins, scoring 10 goals in the process, but something still doesn't seem "right". Hopefully the win sequence will continue and we'll get last season's form back.

Yes it is and if caught and stupid enough to film it, post it on social media trying to be super staunch, take the consequences Ban the racist arseholes in the video. Simples.