pete

And Mendes is seemingly a friend of Parks Junior.

The best managers don't apply.They are approached.

I don't have that information but if Pedro's was the best I would be shocked

There is a case to get the world war 1 title announced nul and void.

Can you put up some Miss-read photo's.

Why was Pedro so important a candidate has to be asked. Judging by his CV it should have been binned at the first stage. Now we have thrown millions at him. Why were the Parks so much an influence in that decision. I wish I could be more positive but I still don't think he has a scooby what he is doing. Tuesday's set-up just cements my thoughts. Goalkeepers rarely make good coaches as their football brain is not developed the same as outfield players. That is my opinion and not an investigated fact.

Limeburner I am trying to give you a chance but it is getting difficult, Will you stop insulting people. Your next ban is permanent.Why can't you just enjoy the forum and use discussion for your point.

Surely the guy is entitled to a holiday? He would not have been able to get away when we were buying all the players. He would not want to go during the season. This looked the best time for me. We were suppose to win that game easily as well.

Don't insult muppets please.

If you don't complain you know for sure they will do nothing. If the Hillsbourgh disaster people had not kept complaining they would have got nothing.

I wrote " IF he did"which means I am not sure":thup:

I won't be adding him to my Hero list. If he did it was totally unintended as he wanted to suck us dry.

In my view what we had on Tuesday was a 4-2-3-1 and PN a 4-5-5-1 which meant Morelos was up against 3 defenders constantly. The wingers had Tav and Wallace in their back-pocket which virtually left the wings a no go area as we were set up for them bombing forward. That meant we had a very narrow 3 in the middle of the park The 5 midfield defenders of PN just worked like an accordion moving from side to side with 3 men shutting down at all times and shut Kranjcar virtually out of the game. We were so static and so easy to defend against it was almost unbearable to watch. It was only really the last 10 minutes we looked like doing anything. Rossiter and Jack offered nothing going forward which left the 3 midfielders and Morelos up against 9 men. Playing 6 men in a defensive set-up (as Wallace and Tav were pushed back) meant we were toothless. Moving to a 3-5-2 may have offered more getting in amongst the back 5 of PN.

I am not sure if these things are open to appeal but with the SFA's statement it would seem not. Whether they in time decide to tear up the papers and call in a new commission remains to be seen. It is not the first time the SFA\SPFL have changed the rules. I would imagine if this happened Rangers would take this decision to court. As we all know UEFA rules do not allow clubs to take associations to court so Scotland would be disbanded from all UEFA competitions including the international team. Would the SFA\SPFL be up for that fight? I doubt it as their chance of winning in court is slim. The SC decided what occurred was not illegal just that tax had to be paid. The one worry for me is we know how corrupt the SFA\SPFL and UEFA are and they work out a deal together no matter what a court of law will find. Don't forget the three big words on the SFA statement"AT THIS TIME" That could be to please the haters but it could also be a sign they are trawling the mud. Only time will tell. The decision to put us back down to the bottom tier has given supporters of other teams the taste of blood and power and they are now again gathering together to put pressure on the SFA\SPFL. Will they fold as they did the last time or try to ride out the storm? I have my suspicions that I may be wrong but I think they will try and ride out the storm this time taking the road of least resistance as the other action will throw up one hell of a stormy road ahead.

It's history was kept there was just a change of owner. We have no chance with that excuse, in my opinion.

Personally I don't think that is an argument. When someone takes something over it does not change the history. We are shouting about that ourselves. When you take something over you buy the whole package. If that were the case how many companies that are being sued would just change their names and say "oh we have nothing to do with that it was oldco"

How long did it take Armstrong to perform for the Tims? Was he not called a dud until last season?

I have yet to see any evidence of an upgrade. In fact Dalcio for McKay could be a downgrade. Whether he gets the sack or not upgrade can not be used at this time.

I would love it just for the wind up factor.

They should stick to selecting buses.

I think that must have been before the game begun.

Do Celtic have a British flag hanging at corrugated city yet?

Is calling us Sevco not abusive and could be judged as sectarian. Name calling is abusive or insulting language referring to a person or group, a verbal abuse. This phenomenon is studied by a variety of academic disciplines from anthropology, to child psychology, to politics. It is also studied by rhetoricians, and a variety of other disciplines that study propaganda techniques and their causes and effects. The technique is most frequently employed within political discourse and school systems, in an attempt to negatively impact their opponent.

It is not me calling them a pub team. It is me that is pointing out that some people do it and later I used it in a sarcastic way.

I read other sites where there are many and are not taken to task.