bmck 117 Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 oh no, it's starting again! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 oh no, it's starting again! I'm off to work! I am morally obliged to be on time:D 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wabashcannonball 0 Posted August 17, 2010 Author Share Posted August 17, 2010 oh no, it's starting again! History is the entrance to, and anvil of the future. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmck 117 Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 deontic modality: all the coolest kids are using it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmck 117 Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 History is the entrance to, and anvil of the future. history's what historians like to think happened 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wabashcannonball 0 Posted August 17, 2010 Author Share Posted August 17, 2010 history's what historians like to think happened If, historians or scribes choose to misrepresent historical fact that is their preogative, it does not alter the truth of history, it merely lies about it. There is only truth, much like 53 titles and tradition, all else is falsehood. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CraigRFC 0 Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 RM is pish nowadays anyway. So we starting the debate again lads? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wabashcannonball 0 Posted August 17, 2010 Author Share Posted August 17, 2010 and the bit about where King william's finances came from? As with everything to do with religion it has nothing to do with religion....and everything to do with politics, as it has always been. Even in the 1660's/90's. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmck 117 Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 As with everything to do with religion it has nothing to do with religion....and everything to do with politics, as it has always been. Even in the 1660's/90's. Wabash, I don't think I've ever agreed with anything you've said so much. I'm not sure what's caused you to say it, but it's 100% correct. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wabashcannonball 0 Posted August 17, 2010 Author Share Posted August 17, 2010 RM is pish nowadays anyway. So we starting the debate again lads? Don't know if there is really a debate on this subject, more likely you are either a traditionalist or not....which ever you are it doesn't make you any better or any worse a supporter than anyone else, it is a broad church with free choice. http://www.gersnetonline.co.uk/vb/showpost.php?p=214025&postcount=135 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.