McGregor to be handed one match ban

[Guest PTB]

Heres the old duffer that banned him

 

http://www.eveningexpress.co.uk/Article.aspx/1058740?UserKey=

[chilledbear 16]

Heres the old duffer that banned him

 

http://www.eveningexpress.co.uk/Article.aspx/1058740?UserKey=

 

I think it would probably be the other 3 on the panel, whoever they are.

[Guest PTB]

I think it would probably be the other 3 on the panel, whoever they are.

 

 

Kevin, Declan and Sean I reckon

[ian1964 10,457]

Shagger does look like a thug though!!!,maybe the below clip goes a way to find out who made the complaint???

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bqx7MA951o&feature=player_embedded]YouTube - Mcshagger u wank[/ame]

[ian1964 10,457]

Stokes v Hamill: the commentery really does prove how bias this prick Walker is!!!

 

 

http://www.myvideo.de/watch/7768773/Stokes_v_Hamill

[bmck 117]

andy andy what's the score!

[ian1964 10,457]

The boy Stokes has a reputation for lunging!!,however the commentery is different and the reaction from the BHEASTS is different!!

 

http://www.scottishfa.co.uk/resources/documents/Disciplinary/ReviewPanel/Celtic%20v%20Hibs_WMV9_Widescreen_640x360.wmv

[plgsarmy 111]

RST Statement

 

The Rangers Supporters Trust has written to SFA Chief Executive Stewart Regan to ask for clarification on the timing and process relating to the one match ban handed out to Rangers goalkeeper Alan McGregor following his innocuous but ill-advised fresh air swipe in the direction of Aberdeen�s Chris McGuire on 26th September.

 

Rangers supporters understandably remain deeply concerned about what appears to be an arbitrary disciplinary process completely lacking in consistency, transparency and accountability. Having now had ample opportunity, the SFA�s subsequent refusal to shed any degree of satisfactory light on the issue has merely served to muddy the waters and generate yet more questions. Specifically, the RST has requested clarification on the following items:

 

�Who brought the matter to the attention of the SFA and in what capacity was the complainant acting?

�How and when was the incident brought to the attention of the SFA?

�On what basis and by whom is it decided that a special disciplinary meeting should or should not be convened?

�Does the complainant receive feedback on these decisions to proceed or not, and if so how?

�Is there any precedent for a complaint to be received and acted upon so rapidly towards the end of the allowed 14-day period following the occurrence of an incident?

�Will the SFA make public the names of the three members of the specially convened committee in order to demonstrate impartiality?

�What precedent exists for a player receiving a one-match ban plus 12 penalty points for violent conduct in a case where no physical contact was actually made?

The SFA urgently needs to take steps to clarify these issues so that Rangers fans (and in fact supporters of all clubs) can gain comfort that the process is not subject to misuse. At present there appears to be no consistency or transparency and no accountability either at the start or the end of the process, which is completely unsatisfactory. If nobody understands who can make a complaint or how or what needs to happen for the SFA to decide whether any complaint should be taken seriously or not, the Association increases the likelihood of disruptive, disingenuous or spurious complaints arriving in droves at Hampden Park every Monday morning ââ?¬â?? accompanied by calls for explanations on the types of issues raised here.

 

The Rangers Supporters Trust awaits an early and transparent response from the new SFA Chief Executive Stewart Regan.

[Frankie 8,186]

Thanks for that plg.

 

Good to see the Trust being active here.