Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

Comparing Boyd & Lafferty to Jelavic & Lafferty makes ZERO sense to me. Just because all 3 are "big" doesnt make them the same type of player. Lafferty being the constant..... you are effectively comparing Jelavic to Boyd - Jelavic is a FAR more mobile player than Boyd, he brings other players into the game better, pulls defenders away better.

 

Just because Boyd & Lafferty didnt work doesnt mean that Jelavic & Lafferty cant.

 

That said, I have no problem in trying Jelavic with Naismith or Fleck or even Weiss. The only reason I suggested Lafferty is because he has played not too badly of late. Fleck may have looked decent last night when he came on but the last time I saw him, in his preferred position I might add of just behind the striker(s) against Aberdeen, he was nigh on invisible.

 

A decent cameo last night doesnt make him all of a sudden a "must-start".

I'm comparing because they are both big out and out strikers. 2 big strikers never works, surely you know this? No two ways about it, it just doen't work. Lafferty and Jelavic are both players who play similar roles and would be horrific together

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.