Tannochsidebear 2,321 Posted March 29, 2012 Share Posted March 29, 2012 Rangers Fans Working Group Statement Regan walks while fans talk. Stewart Regan, the Chief Executive of the SFA, disgracefully walked out of a meeting with the Rangers Fans Working Group at Hampden earlier today. Mr Regan was being closely questioned about the lack of practical help the SFA was rendering to one of it’s member clubs in administration. Earlier in the meeting he had twice threatened to walk out when his point of view was being challenged. The meeting with Mr Regan fell into two distinct parts. The first was to discuss the mechanisms for ensuring that the record of good behaviour by Rangers fans was encouraged by the implementation of standards and good practice across the board in Scottish football. The second was specifically to do with the treatment of Rangers whilst the club is in administration. It was put to Mr Regan that whilst the club is effectively decapitated during administration it was unfair that quasi-judicial proceedings were being undertaken when no new owners were in place and the firm of administrators in charge were unlikely to have the knowledge or commitment to ensure a vigorous defence of the club’s long-term interests. Similarly, it was noted that there was a widespread feeling amongst the Rangers support that the SFA administration was not impartial and that any sanctions taken against the club at this time were likely to be perceived as unfair. The Fans Working Group consider that our concerns were put forward in a sensible and helpful manner and are therefore both shocked and disappointed that Mr Regan chose to behave in such an unprofessional manner. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,356 Posted March 29, 2012 Share Posted March 29, 2012 These are fans who have taken time off their jobs to put their valid points across to Regan and he has treated them with disdain. He should consider his position. Perhaps it's difficult for him to operate independently of his puppet master. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted March 29, 2012 Share Posted March 29, 2012 I hope the Working Group make sure this gets into the hands of as many people as possible in the Scottish press! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,290 Posted March 29, 2012 Share Posted March 29, 2012 As has been posted on FF .. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted March 29, 2012 Share Posted March 29, 2012 He should consider his position. He should have done that long ago or been booted out! Either way, he certainly shouldn't still be in a position at the SFA! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted March 29, 2012 Share Posted March 29, 2012 Do we have Regan's contact details ? We should be bombarding these inept bunch of to let them know this will not be stood for. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,290 Posted March 29, 2012 Share Posted March 29, 2012 This behaviour again simply shows him and his lot up for what they are. Next stop, UEFA. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 0 Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 The disciplinary proceedings are being dealt with by a legal team, so therefore not troubling the administrators in the slightest. What reaction was expected when it was more or less put to Regan that he was in cahoots with Lawwell in some anti-Rangers conspiracy? Following on from the ill-advised RFFF announcement, we get yet another attempt to capture the populist vote. The mind boggles how some of these people manage to get themselves into such positions of influence. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 The disciplinary proceedings are being dealt with by a legal team, so therefore not troubling the administrators in the slightest. It's a legal team employed by the administrators though, not one employed by a Rangers Chairman, CEO or board of directors. Is that right? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 What reaction was expected when it was more or less put to Regan that he was in cahoots with Lawwell in some anti-Rangers conspiracy? I haven't been on other forums tonight. Are there minutes of the meeting or something similar? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.