rbr 1,247 Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 It's built along similar lines to the RFFF, it may even contain members who are on both committees. Their audience with Regan certainly hasn't helped to create a climate where further constructive talks can take place, although I'm not certain that was their goal in any case. And exactly who's fault is that then , you seem to be laying the blame entirely at our door 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 0 Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 And exactly who's fault is that then , you seem to be laying the blame entirely at our door I'm not inclined to believe that it was all as one-sided as is portrayed in the statement, no. Do you really believe that accusations of SFA collusion with Celtic can be described as sensible and helpful questioning? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpy 0 Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 Dynamite stuff. Has the media picked up on Regan's petulance? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,186 Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 Well obviously there are two sides to every story and without being there we don't know exactly what happened. However, walking out of a meeting is at best unprofessional and only lends weight to the argument Regan will not debate with other points of view. The continual cuts in the Alex Thomson interview infer the same almost happened there. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tannochsidebear 2,322 Posted March 30, 2012 Author Share Posted March 30, 2012 The disciplinary proceedings are being dealt with by a legal team, so therefore not troubling the administrators in the slightest. What reaction was expected when it was more or less put to Regan that he was in cahoots with Lawwell in some anti-Rangers conspiracy? Following on from the ill-advised RFFF announcement, we get yet another attempt to capture the populist vote. The mind boggles how some of these people manage to get themselves into such positions of influence. You havent a clue what you are talking about, to be frank. At no time was it put to Regan that he was in cahoots with lawwell to have a go at Rangers. And please do not confuse the RFWG with the RFFF, they are very seperate bodies. The only similarity being that they are full of Rangers supporters giving up their own time to help the club and the fans. It easy to snipe from a position of ignorance. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 0 Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 (edited) You havent a clue what you are talking about, to be frank. At no time was it put to Regan that he was in cahoots with lawwell to have a go at Rangers. And please do not confuse the RFWG with the RFFF, they are very seperate bodies. The only similarity being that they are full of Rangers supporters giving up their own time to help the club and the fans. It easy to snipe from a position of ignorance. Ok, would you like to expand on the stated point about the SFA not being regarded as impartial? Edited March 30, 2012 by caseyjones 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueMazza 0 Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 Casey why the assumption that SFA in cahoots with Celtic? We've seen what the SFA will do with Rangers - UEFA cup run anyone? Celtic are not the only other team in Scotland. Did Regan give a reason as to why he walked out? Walking out because his points/opinion were being challenged is not reason enough at all. Unless he was being sworn at/abused/not allowed to speak (which I doubt) he has no excuse for this. Incredibly bad practice. I'd like to see what he has to say on the matter as well. Then you just look for the middle ground between the two statements lol. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,457 Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 We should use the fighting fund to get a top lawyer onto the SFA 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juancornetto 1 Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 Interesting...some eye witness testimony would be even more interesting. Unless he was shouted down, sworn at or just spoken to in a manner none of us would like then I can't see why he should just walk out. Which line of questioning provoked that reaction? We need someone who was there to spill. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 Really starting to worry what side you bat for Caseyjones all you ever seem to do is put the boot into Rangers our fans and now The Working Group which has been praised for its work on behalf of the club by the top levels in this country. Regan was asked why one of its oldest members was being booted from pillar to post while in admin instead of waiting for the new buyer to take charge and then have a full investigation, his answer he gets up and walks out. If you think that's the way the head of the SFA should conduct himself when asked a question then that makes you a bigger clown than he is. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.