rbr 1,247 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gregory Ioannidis @LawTop20 With RFC ending, liabilities and sanctions [Court of Session, dual contracts etc] would also end. This is the main advantage of New Rangers. Gregory Ioannidis @LawTop20 The 'transfer' of the OldCo's liabilities to the NewCo, would mean a serious violation of the separate corporate personality principle. Gregory Ioannidis @LawTop20 @Paulmcc12 @evanjhenderson @mdkster Just to help: SPL may vote to apply sanctions to NewCo but it would be in violation of national law 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Someone get the Court of Session booked & see if the guy who ruled on the transfer thing is free.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWeeBlueDevil 0 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 It's not sanctions im worried about it's the potential loss of titles, and if they cant put sanctions on the newco for this then they will be IMO more likely to punish us by stripping titles. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,353 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 If they feel that nothing has changed then they can take acton against us, but we must also be allowed to play in the SPL without penalties. If it has changed then they can't take action aghainst us but can look to not allow us back in SPL. They can't have their cake and eat it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Sounds like the timmy twitterati are still scrambling around trying to find legal arguments for us not retaining our history. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bluebell12 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Hi good bears, this is the mince they're spouting: The Scottish Premier League has ruled charges against Rangers for paying players outside of their contracts will apply to Charles Green's newco if they are voted into the top flight. The league conducted an investigation into allegations the club contravened regulations by not declaring payments being made to playing staff between 1998 and 2010. After an initial lack of co-operation from administrators Duff and Phelps in order to conduct the investigation, the SPL has now ruled there is a case to answer over a possible breach of its rules. The situation is complicated in that Rangers are soon to cease to be a member of the league, with an application having been made by Green to have the club's share transferred to his new company. A date of July 4 has been set for a decision on that matter, at which a 8-4 majority is required in a vote of the clubs, including a representative from the old Rangers company, which remains in administration. If they gain the necessary support, the SPL has confirmed charges will then be brought against the new club over the actions of the old company. If then found guilty, a disciplinary case will be brought which could see a range of sanctions brought against the club, ranging from a fine to the stripping of titles, or even expulsion from the league. A statement from the SPL read: "The SPL Board heard a report from its solicitors following the investigation into payments to, or for the benefit of, players allegedly made by Rangers FC outside of contract. "The delay in concluding the investigation was caused by an initial lack of co-operation from Rangers FC. "The investigation has now been completed and, in the view of the SPL, there is a prima facie case to answer in respect of its rules. "Disciplinary charges will be brought when the future status of Rangers FC is clarified and prior to the start of season 2012/13. "An application for registration of transfer of Rangers’ SPL share has been received. Consideration of the application will depend on receipt by the SPL Board of all required documentation and verification. "A general meeting of all 12 member clubs has been convened for 10am on Wednesday 4 July 2012 for members to decide whether to approve the transfer." The full list of sanctions available to the SPL are a warning, a reprimand, a fine, the annulment of an official match, ordering a match is replayed, a points deduction, the award of an official match to an opponent, ordering games to be played behind closed doors, stadium closure, expulsion from the league, the withdrawal of a title or award, ordering compensation to be paid, a signing embargo and/or any other punishment the SPL board sees fit. Really feel hatred towards these vile people. It appears they will stop at nothing. If they try this, I really hope we take them to the cleaners. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 If they feel that nothing has changed then they can take acton against us, but we must also be allowed to play in the SPL without penalties. If it has changed then they can't take action aghainst us but can look to not allow us back in SPL. They can't have their cake and eat it. Yep.... and it's the same sort of catch-22 dilemma the blazers at the SFA are scrambling their ten braincells over. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gregory Ioannidis @LawTop20 With RFC ending, liabilities and sanctions [Court of Session, dual contracts etc] would also end. This is the main advantage of New Rangers. Gregory Ioannidis @LawTop20 The 'transfer' of the OldCo's liabilities to the NewCo, would mean a serious violation of the separate corporate personality principle. Gregory Ioannidis @LawTop20 @Paulmcc12 @evanjhenderson @mdkster Just to help: SPL may vote to apply sanctions to NewCo but it would be in violation of national law He's a Tim and is Samaras's agent. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 If i was Green or the RFFF i would have our QC so far up these c@nts arses, he would be up on a separate charge of indecent assault. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 0 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 He's a Tim and is Samaras's agent. I know and I can't find that tweet anywhere ! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.