Juancornetto 1 Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 More importantly where does this leave the clubs (5 so far) who have come out and said they'll vote against us? They'd be cutting their own throats, held to ransom by bitter hate filled fans to punish a club and set of fans who may well be victims of fraud. It's starting to look feintly ridiculous...add to that the various cases and punishments the SFA/SPL have been trying to throw at us and it starts to look a bit sinister. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWeeBlueDevil 0 Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 More importantly where does this leave the clubs (5 so far) who have come out and said they'll vote against us? They'd be cutting their own throats, held to ransom by bitter hate filled fans to punish a club and set of fans who may well be victims of fraud. It's starting to look feintly ridiculous...add to that the various cases and punishments the SFA/SPL have been trying to throw at us and it starts to look a bit sinister. Nobody else apart from Rangers supporters see it that way . Probably because they are all in on it and playing their part to keep us down .... All in the name of sporting integrity ofcourse . 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
foggy dewhurst 0 Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Breaking: http://local.stv.tv/glasgow/107837-rangers-crisis-crown-launches-criminal-investigation-into-whyte-takeover/ and not before blinking time 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Please put David Murray in jail. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears 0 Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 All they'll do is say we used bets long before cw came along. I know we ain't been found guilty of that yet btw 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,179 Posted June 25, 2012 Author Share Posted June 25, 2012 All they'll do is say we used bets long before cw came along. I know we ain't been found guilty of that yet btw EBTs not related to existing disrepute charges. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,277 Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Nobody else apart from Rangers supporters see it that way . Probably because they are all in on it and playing their part to keep us down .... All in the name of sporting integrity ofcourse . The large mass of people believe what they are being told. More often than not, they do not care to look any deeper than what they are being told. The opinion of the other, most vocal supporters of other need simply to be ignored. You could just as well ask a Kop member about their opinion on Everton or Swindon. Sadly in this day and age, these most vocal idiots (and we sure have them too) cramp under the mantle of a supporters organisation, have a spokesperson and start threatening their clubs (mind you) on behalf of all *insert SPL club of your choice*'s support. Whatever the clubs say, we shall not be fooled here. These supporters looking for our club's blood are just the shield carried by the SPL chairmen, a shield to hide behind. For at the end of the day, this lot does not carry the power of all supporters of their club, while the chairmen see pound signs by the means of possibly finishing higher at the top of the table and may actually have a European fixture or two to look forward too. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 I wonder where this places those want to punish Rangers for integrity reasons? How can anyone punish the club and fans for being the victim of a crime? Would the actions of the SFA be considered prejudicial to any criminal enquiry since the enquiry is looking into the running of the club after purchase as well as the purchase itself? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,179 Posted June 25, 2012 Author Share Posted June 25, 2012 Would the actions of the SFA be considered prejudicial to any criminal enquiry since the enquiry is looking into the running of the club after purchase as well as the purchase itself? There's definitely questions to be asked here. Will the media ask them or will they be happy to ignore? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim1955 12 Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Would the actions of the SFA be considered prejudicial to any criminal enquiry since the enquiry is looking into the running of the club after purchase as well as the purchase itself? The plot thickens. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.