Charlotte Fakes ID

[SteveC 150]

Whoever it is has put more up. Anti-McCoist stuff and an introduction to it that proves whoever it is, is definitely anti-Gers in a decidedly paranoid timothy way, you'd think that we'd got off with something rather than having an illegal punishment imposed for being victims of a crime:

 

In April 2012, Ally McCoist famously asked this question of the three members of the SFA Judicial Panel that imposed transfer sanctions on Rangers FC. At the time, it was widely reported that Rangers personnel already knew the names of the panelists and many speculated that McCoist was just shamelessly trying to stir up supporters to threaten those who might impose penalties in the future.

 

Just how well Rangers knew these people might be surprising. It was reported after the three panelists were named in the Scottish media that one of them, Alistair Murning, was a Rangers season ticket holder. It was odd that he did not recuse himself from such duties, but given the penalties imposed, few doubted at the time that a fair outcome was achieved.

 

The attached email correspondence shows that in October 2011, just six months before sitting to determine the punishment for his club's failure to remit taxes withheld from players' wages, Mr. Murning was in close communications with Craig Whyte's father. His refusal to believe the evidence against Craig Whyte at this time is interesting too.

 

As an SFA Judicial Panelist, did Murning put aside his loyalties to his club and act impeccably? Or is there a pattern of 'Rangers men' sitting in key positions to ensure that punishments are manageable and minimal? You now have some more information to help you decide for yourself.

 

http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1rkccft

Edited May 19, 2013 by SteveC

[Guest WeeElBee]

Whoever it is has put more up. Anti-McCoist stuff and an introduction to it that proves whoever it is, is definitely anti-Gers in a decidedly paranoid timothy way, you'd think that we'd got off with something rather than having an illegal punishment imposed for being victims of a crime:

 

In April 2012, Ally McCoist famously asked this question of the three members of the SFA Judicial Panel that imposed transfer sanctions on Rangers FC. At the time, it was widely reported that Rangers personnel already knew the names of the panelists and many speculated that McCoist was just shamelessly trying to stir up supporters to threaten those who might impose penalties in the future.

 

Just how well Rangers knew these people might be surprising. It was reported after the three panelists were named in the Scottish media that one of them, Alistair Murning, was a Rangers season ticket holder. It was odd that he did not recuse himself from such duties, but given the penalties imposed, few doubted at the time that a fair outcome was achieved.

 

The attached email correspondence shows that in October 2011, just six months before sitting to determine the punishment for his club's failure to remit taxes withheld from players' wages, Mr. Murning was in close communications with Craig Whyte's father. His refusal to believe the evidence against Craig Whyte at this time is interesting too.

 

As an SFA Judicial Panelist, did Murning put aside his loyalties to his club and act impeccably? Or is there a pattern of 'Rangers men' sitting in key positions to ensure that punishments are manageable and minimal? You now have some more information to help you decide for yourself.

 

http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1rkccft

 

He/She/It is scraping the barrell with that.. realising their documents n snippets of recordings are not as explosive as they would like and FFS We got hit with an unlawful embargo and he is making out we got off lightly. "punishments manageable and minimal"

[North Rd 0]

Could it be .....Tommo?

[Frankie 8,153]

Could it be .....Tommo?

 

No chance. He may know him though.

[bluebear54 0]

When these tweets are appearing and being quoted in main line newspapers (English article, Scotsman) it's time to pour some water over all of this.

If everything there is true, and can be provenanced, bring it in.

As it stands, it is not "evidence" as sources would lead us to believe.

I'm surprised Scotland's finest aren't looking into this. The whole takeover thing is under investigation is it not?

i noted the "he who laughs last" quote earlier, and yes, I agree.

I truly hope a few people get their comeuppance - in spades.

And the best bit for me will be the day we are back to being champions again, and that mob take their rightful place.

Scummy behaviour in my book.

[bluebear54 0]

No chance. He may know him though.

 

Can we ask him? Put him in the spotlight, so to speak.

[Guest chas1937]

As I'm new too forums I'd just like too say hello too everyone and really enjoy what I have read as a visitor

[Super Cooper 0]

As I'm new too forums I'd just like too say hello too everyone and really enjoy what I have read as a visitor

 

How did you manage to read this site as a visitor mate? It wouldn't let me, that's why i signed up!

 

Welcome.

[Frankie 8,153]

I think you can only read one or two posts a day as a visitor. Possibly more if you delete you cache etc.

[forlanssister 3,050]

I actually suspected a member of this forum initially , but the more they post I think it`s scumothy after all . Maybe quite a notorious scumbag at that .

 

Thoughts ? .

 

Pray tell who!....