p murray on radio scotland

[Ser Barristan Selmy 222]

Paul Murray is quite good at talking isn't he. Shame about the rest.

[simplythebest 0]

When Murray takes close on £4m from the club, like chucky did, then you have the right to give him the same level of scrutiny. You seem willing to give everyone and his uncle a chance, apart from people who obviously care for the club, and not just their bottom line.

 

The point I keep making about this is that Paul Murray has had more than once chance with Rangers. I've never once said I have a problem giving Frank Blin a go, in fact having him involved would have likely been very beneficial, it's a pity he seems to have walked away completely.

 

Whatever you think of Stockbridge (who I would actually like to see replaced), Mather etc surely the alternative needs scrutinised like everyone involved with the club's boardroom and running should be?

[Frankie 8,148]

Blin hasn't stepped aside GS ? reports from various sources must have got it wrong, thanks for clearing that up.

 

Oh, he's stepped aside all right but we both know it's not because he thinks the books and/or future funding of the club are rosy.

[Frankie 8,148]

The point I keep making about this is that Paul Murray has had more than once chance with Rangers. I've never once said I have a problem giving Frank Blin a go, in fact having him involved would have likely been very beneficial, it's a pity he seems to have walked away completely.

 

Whatever you think of Stockbridge (who I would actually like to see replaced), Mather etc surely the alternative needs scrutinised like everyone involved with the club's boardroom and running should be?

 

Everyone should be scrutinised - everyone.

 

Especially people who employ (or work for eh crucible) sharks like Irvine.

 

What does that say about their judgement - PM included?

[simplythebest 0]

Everyone should be scrutinised - everyone.

 

Especially people who employ (or work for eh crucible) sharks like Irvine.

 

What does that say about their judgement - PM included?

I don't want Jack Irvine at the club but I suppose it shows he's good at what he does that MediaHouse have such a long association with Rangers.

 

Albeit some of his recent internet ramblings are bizarre to say the least.

[Ser Barristan Selmy 222]

The point I keep making about this is that Paul Murray has had more than once chance with Rangers.

You don't say

[Ser Barristan Selmy 222]

I don't want Jack Irvine at the club but I suppose it shows he's good at what he does that MediaHouse have such a long association with Rangers.

 

Albeit some of his recent internet ramblings are bizarre to say the least.

Given our widely known appalling PR history, how do you come to this conclusion?

[crucible 0]

Oh, he's stepped aside all right but we both know it's not because he thinks the books and/or future funding of the club are rosy.

 

You have the upper hand there, clairvoyancy is a great gift that you have been bestowed with, so what does he think.

[simplythebest 0]

Given our widely known appalling PR history, how do you come to this conclusion?

 

David Murray and Craig Whyte PR wise were very well protected until things all came to a head.

[Frankie 8,148]

I don't want Jack Irvine at the club but I suppose it shows he's good at what he does that MediaHouse have such a long association with Rangers.

 

Albeit some of his recent internet ramblings are bizarre to say the least.

 

He sure is good at his job - I didn't say otherwise. That's why we all bought into Murray, into Whyte (different forum handles for that gig) and eventually Green.

 

What I did say is I don't want him here and his behaviour brings the qualities of those who do into disrepute. And that's why I won't buy into Stockbridge and Mather. Everyone else can make up their own mind.