Defending the Boo boys

[TheWee BlueDevil 0]

That really is one of the most patronising things I've read throughout this whole tiresome shambles. So many "I"s in there. Starting to take himself way too seriously I'm afraid. Needless to say this article is going down particularly well on another forum. Playing to the gallery again perhaps?

[D'Artagnan 173]

That really is one of the most patronising things I've read throughout this whole tiresome shambles. So many "I"s in there. Starting to take himself way too seriously I'm afraid. Needless to say this article is going down particularly well on another forum. Playing to the gallery again perhaps?

 

Still awaiting you substantiating the attack you made a few weeks back . How's that coming along ?

 

That's the one you claimed I was trying to be all things to all people and manipulate myself into a position.

 

But now apparently, I'm playing to the gallery on a particular forum, Are you having trouble making up your mind ?

Edited December 12, 2013 by D'Artagnan

[TheWee BlueDevil 0]

Still awaiting you substantiating the attack you made a few weeks back . How's that coming along ?

Attack? What attack? You are starting to believe your own / RM hype D'Art.

Time you got back to reality.

[ranger_syntax 3,779]

The voting I saw by some members PLG ran contrary to what RST admin seemed to be advocating. Thats all - nothing sinsiter' date=' not a dig.[/quote']

 

Which poll result was contrary to what the RST admin advocated, Wallace?

[Stimpy 0]

David Leggat's

 

He'd be the last blogger I'd worry about. Let himself down and the readership by getting carried away all too often.

[D'Artagnan 173]

Attack? What attack? You are starting to believe your own / RM hype D'Art.

Time you got back to reality.

 

Forgottten already ? The one you "couldn't be bothered" verifying from my previous articles, the allegations you had made.

Edited December 12, 2013 by D'Artagnan

[D'Artagnan 173]

Which poll result was contrary to what the RST admin advocated, Wallace?

 

http://www.therst.co.uk/poll/agm-voting/

 

 

Im talking about individual members expressing a view which ran contrary to admin's position

[D'Artagnan 173]

He'd be the last blogger I'd worry about. Let himself down and the readership by getting carried away all too often.

 

SB

 

I think describing it as "getting carried away" is being particularly kind to him.

[D'Artagnan 173]

To help the Support make an informed choice, you should post what was said at the meeting with Stockbridge.

 

I would very much hope, and expect, they release a minute of that prior to the AGM CB

[Frankie 8,157]

I think VB are often hard done by as one can only admire a lot of the hard work they've done over the last few years.

 

However, there's also no doubt a few of their higher-profile members let themselves down across the community with their behaviour. Perhaps that can be said of other forums' users as well but it seems most common from VB-related people. I might be wrong but, as someone with no axe to grind in that respect, I do think by association (unfairly or not) VB is seen as divisive. Like I say, they're not the only offenders in that sense but if you're to offer a defence of them then such issues have to be explored.