bluebear54 0 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Am I legally allowed to clap the notion that I hate him. I would have a backup ready. Like saying you were clapping Peralta. Or your hands were cold. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblue 64 53 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 He would have removed the posts because they were drawn to his attention. It is not a matter of guilt. He removed them because they were defamatory so that makes him guilty. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountain Bear 0 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 He removed them because they were defamatory so that makes him guilty. Ah, the "throw them in the river and if they drown they're innocent" school of justice. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real PapaBear 0 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 I would have a backup ready. Like saying you were clapping Peralta. yeah, but it would have to be a believable backup - nobody would believe he was clapping Peralta. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,061 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 He removed them because they were defamatory so that makes him guilty. Aye, right sure it does, no need for a trial or anything like that just send him straight to the gallows! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblue 64 53 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 There is no need to go to court over this if he was willing to remove them, but why then go and repeat them, maybe Craig fancies his chances in court. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 8 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 He removed them because they were defamatory so that makes him guilty. He didn't post them, so he isn't responsible for them and he removed them when he was asked to. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Aye, right sure it does, no need for a trial or anything like that just send him straight to the gallows! Threaten to ruin his life first though! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 R.T.I.D NI understands there have been approaches made to use the fighting fund money to finance the legal expenses of anti board factions within the Rangers support. Whilst we appreciate many Rangers fans have varying views on the board and the way our club is being run, we as a group cannot allow money raised here in Ulster to be used, other than for the good of Rangers FC. We take no sides on who is right and wrong on this matter, as we are neutral group with only the best interests of Rangers FC at heart. Many NI Rangers fans have contributed hard earned cash towards preserving and upholding the traditions of Rangers FC and we fully expect any money raised by us to be spent only on the betterment of our club only. We ask that all sides take a step back and stop the bitter in fighting which is embarrassing our club. SIGNED THE COMMITTEE R.T.I.D.NI 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 I'm surprised that this £200k law suit has taken so long to come out in the press. What is it, almost 10 days later or something? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.