BrahimHemdani 1 Posted May 2, 2014 Share Posted May 2, 2014 If it is he won't be getting it. But it's not it's at easdales discession. There will still have to be proper criteria and justification. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,061 Posted May 2, 2014 Share Posted May 2, 2014 There will still have to be proper criteria and justification. Ah this is you being sarcastic again isn't it? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted May 2, 2014 Share Posted May 2, 2014 Nicola Sturgeon is a horrid witch 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 2, 2014 Share Posted May 2, 2014 There will still have to be proper criteria and justification. Your a funny guy 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted May 2, 2014 Share Posted May 2, 2014 Our board should sack this new PR guy and give you the job, seriously.Wouldn't even want a directors box seat so aye why not 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTinMan99 0 Posted May 2, 2014 Share Posted May 2, 2014 There's a free f*cking loaf with every bad publicity Rangers story these days. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfly Trumpeter 50 Posted May 2, 2014 Share Posted May 2, 2014 His salary is par for the course and the any criticism of the bonus should be delayed until we know the terms. If it is in line with proper criteria for improved financial performance then it may well be justified in whole or in part. The £25,000 for promotion isn't justified but it's a great deal beter than 100% for the same. £320,000 a year for a company making massive losses and a turnover sub 25 million is not par for the course. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,061 Posted May 2, 2014 Share Posted May 2, 2014 Wonder if Graham will treat me to a Bradie and a Bovril tomorrow?........ 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 2, 2014 Share Posted May 2, 2014 £320,000 a year for a company making massive losses and a turnover sub 25 million is not par for the course. About 3 times what my sister gets for a company twice as big. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted May 2, 2014 Share Posted May 2, 2014 About 3 times what my sister gets for a company twice as big. Obviously being discriminated against then on the grounds of her sex. She should have applied for the job. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.