Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

we should not be paying anyone a bonus if we are not spl champions. even then 100 percent is scandelous.

 

bonus for wining the league and cl qualification. that should be it.

 

What I would say is that any bonus paid should have proportional and recognizable value for the club.

That is to say that any contract that contains a bonus clause should clearly state what tangible targets or similar would trigger such a bonus.

 

In the case of Graham Wallace and the 100% bonus we now know that this isn't the case and this IMO is what makes it particularly damaging to the credibility of the individual, the board and the finances of the club.

 

Added to that is the way we have found out, with the club having to be forced by legal means.

It only makes you wonder what else is under the bonnet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.