Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

I didn't feel like he was treating me with contempt.

 

When politicians go on the box and fail to answer hard questions they are treating the electorate with contempt and the only way one can thole it is if one happens to be a voter of this or that party.

 

You can't have a project entitled 'Ready to Listen' and then ignore - whether you feel they have any legitimacy or not - the questions thousands (and it is easily in the thousands) of fans want to ask, just because they might be awkward.

 

I mean, I'm at a loss. You can only view that session as a positive move if you are completely behind Mr Wallace and refuse to engage critically with anything he has said or done, saving the possibility of it being a first step. Not answering the question about bonuses and redundancies is not only contemptuous, it's cowardly; responding to questions about the scouting network yet again with no specifics - what was the point? He might as well not have bothered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they are but I read "negative coverage " as implying coverage in the media; in other words it wasn't so much the fact that Mr King and the UoF were saying what they were saying it was the wide coverage it was getting that was the issue.

 

"in some quarters".............. is the phrase you want to examine.

 

 

Put the shovel away BH

 

:ost:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't expect anything and we didn't get anything.

 

We need something more suitable. You do agree with that?

 

He has made mistakes and it seems to me he is going to get criticised now whatever he does.

 

I get a sense that he genuinely wants to turn our Club around despite the obvious constraints he has to work under.

 

I agree that he needs to reach out to the wider fan base, since the survey should only 5% belonging to any group and how much wider does it get than Twitter?

 

That said I would indeed like to see an open meeting but I suspect 20,000+ would want to go; however it would not be impossible to hold it in Ibrox with roving mikes; or the main hall at the SECC which takes around 11,000 I think. Whether you would get any different answers I'm not so sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not answering the question about bonuses and redundancies is not only contemptuous, it's cowardly; responding to questions about the scouting network yet again with no specifics - what was the point? He might as well not have bothered.

 

How specific would you expect him to be about bonuses and redundancies, Andy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

He has made mistakes and it seems to me he is going to get criticised now whatever he does.

 

.

 

No, he deliberately tried to mislead/revise.

 

If that isn't the case, we have an idiot on 315K plus 100% bonus.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not impressed at all.

 

A Twitter Q&A is a quick way to portray an impression of fan engagement and appease the mobile/social media masses a little without actually engaging the fans properly, but it could never be regarded as a serious medium for proper engagement or any sort of meaningful and detailed debate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the idea was good, but agree with others that the execution was poor.

 

I don't think (from what I know of twitter) that it is the best platform to properly express the information that was required. I think a live, "controlled" debate/discussion is what is needed. A controlled environment is required so that the whole things doesn't descend into chaos - set a date & have fans submit question before hand (similar to Question Time on BBC). This still gives the board (or whoever) the chance to pick & choose the questions, but it would also give more opportunity for discussion and the proper expansion of answers. Hopefully it would also remove the chance of folk just shouting questions/accusations/abuse etc at random.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When politicians go on the box and fail to answer hard questions they are treating the electorate with contempt and the only way one can thole it is if one happens to be a voter of this or that party.

 

You can't have a project entitled 'Ready to Listen' and then ignore - whether you feel they have any legitimacy or not - the questions thousands (and it is easily in the thousands) of fans want to ask, just because they might be awkward.

 

I mean, I'm at a loss. You can only view that session as a positive move if you are completely behind Mr Wallace and refuse to engage critically with anything he has said or done, saving the possibility of it being a first step. Not answering the question about bonuses and redundancies is not only contemptuous, it's cowardly; responding to questions about the scouting network yet again with no specifics - what was the point? He might as well not have bothered.

 

The leader of the movement you support is champion at that. :P

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.