Rangersitis 0 Posted June 12, 2014 Share Posted June 12, 2014 Wasn't King warned off about undermining RIFC through the press? I don't believe that would stop him having his say(through his lawyer, of course). 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,151 Posted June 12, 2014 Share Posted June 12, 2014 I agree that a lack of information is what causes confusion, but I just don't see what he can add at this particular time as the board are saying absolutely nothing. They are playing a blinder on that front. He could come out and repeat his previous attacks but they will just be rebuffed once more with a terse statement and that may even be perceived by the support that he has nothing more to add. I would expect him to fire away whenever there is an official statement released. King doesn't need to attack the board (or undermine RIFC) to give a sit rep on his position. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted June 12, 2014 Share Posted June 12, 2014 http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/rangers-power-struggle-ex-director-dave-3537769 That was nothing more than tit-for-tat. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted June 12, 2014 Share Posted June 12, 2014 King doesn't need to attack the board (or undermine RIFC) to give a sit rep on his position. Not disagreeing with you, but what would you like to hear from him? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,416 Posted June 12, 2014 Share Posted June 12, 2014 That was nothing more than tit-for-tat. Maybe so, I don't know how these things work! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted June 12, 2014 Share Posted June 12, 2014 Maybe so, I don't know how these things work! Just my take on it. It was after a ST holder had gone to the police with claims that Wallace and the board had lied at the AGM and later about ST sales. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 12, 2014 Share Posted June 12, 2014 As Frankie noted, I did include my reasons for questioning King's ability to invest straight away, a problem McColl apparently faced / face too. I assume you did not wonder why he threw in his children's inheritance, did you? The latter, BTW, is a point I'd also make to Hildy with regards to Kings ability to raise money. It may mean nothing, but it should raise the odd eyebrow. It was a turn of phrase to show how desperate things were at Rangers. He is having to spend money his kids should be inheriting to save us. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 12, 2014 Share Posted June 12, 2014 You don't do yourself, or Dave King, any favours when you come out with nonsense like that. The 'wealth off the scale' scam has already been done. Not my words but those of a prosecutor in court. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,151 Posted June 12, 2014 Share Posted June 12, 2014 Not disagreeing with you, but what would you like to hear from him? What I've always wanted to hear - why he's a better option and what he's currently doing to achieve that. Doesn't have to be every minute detail. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted June 12, 2014 Share Posted June 12, 2014 What I've always wanted to hear - why he's a better option and what he's currently doing to achieve that. Doesn't have to be every minute detail. Fair enough points. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.