Hildy 0 Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 They may well have new knowledge. As likely they have made an assumption based on their meeting a couple of months back when they were told a deal would be done for safeguarding ibrox but murray park seemed to be off the agenda.. Their belief has been for 'some time'. That dates it and also suggests that the sale of Murray Park was planned before any season ticket boycott played a part in proceedings. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 7 posts and he's not on here criticising the SOS. There are so many holes in this statement that I wouldn't know where to begin. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 If 'faceless investors and hedge fund' own less than a third how do they control the boardroom? From inside 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,416 Posted July 26, 2014 Author Share Posted July 26, 2014 Catch 22 indeed. You encourage fans to withhold cash then castigate board for having a shortfall. Further castigation on their methods of err making up the missing funding because of the fans withholding. Do the sos ever wonder if they played right into the hands of the board? The people running/ruining our club are the real danger,not the fans,these people are only interested in cash,not the fans. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,258 Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 From inside By what means? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 By what means? total control 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmu 0 Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 The people running/ruining our club are the real danger,not the fans,these people are only interested in cash,not the fans. Yes iain sos want the ownership to change. As you guys are advocating game by game attendance i can't see how you hurt them! Only way you get that is for a complete boycott of everything so they have no income to spend on themselves. Dangerous games as they could just just sell off everything and leave us with nothing! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 Yes iain sos want the ownership to change. As you guys are advocating game by game attendance i can't see how you hurt them! Only way you get that is for a complete boycott of everything so they have no income to spend on themselves. Dangerous games as they could just just sell off everything and leave us with nothing! Aye? What do they pay themselves like? How would we pay the staffs wages during this complete boycott? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmu 0 Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 Aye? What do they pay themselves like? How would we pay the staffs wages during this complete boycott? I'm not advocating any boycott as you are right it would lead to complete shutdown of the club. Just trying to point out some glaring holes in the sos strategy. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 I'm not advocating any boycott as you are right it would lead to complete shutdown of the club. Just trying to point out some glaring holes in the sos strategy. Agreed mate. There are many of them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.