buster. 4,808 Posted December 22, 2014 Share Posted December 22, 2014 (edited) Isn't it called Rangersitis...? Could be a first in medical science, as it seems as though only spindoctors or the gulible can see the symptoms. Edited December 22, 2014 by buster. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,247 Posted December 22, 2014 Share Posted December 22, 2014 He's a different Evil than Whyte, Green your words, took it from them you meant he is a different commodity. Whyte and Green are capitalist con artists, taking all they can grab in a quick attack and run. For that is all they could do, with no financial back up whatsoever. Ashley "rapes" on a different level and will "ensure" that he can "rape" as hard and long as he can. For that he needs a "functional victim" and he has the means to keep it functional, Whyte and Green had not. No-one wants to become another Black-and-White Ashley harlot. For harlots live a miserable life. Yet, they live ... and that is something neither Whyte nor Green could offer. NB: Was Ashley behind Green all along? Who knows? We can speculate all day tough. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,247 Posted December 22, 2014 Share Posted December 22, 2014 (edited) Sorry dB, you think he's not solely here to make money? So what other reasons do you think are worth considering bearing in mind he has no known connections to Rangers, Glasgow or indeed Scotland? Have already said that quite a few times. These people have egos and while making money may very well be their only driving force in life, getting something "special" in return every now and then should not by default be discounted. Edited December 22, 2014 by der Berliner 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted December 22, 2014 Share Posted December 22, 2014 (edited) In the Rangers soap opera we how have horticulture repeatedly featuring Are there any gardens in Berlin where holes can be dug deeper and deeper............ ............. Edited December 22, 2014 by buster. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 243 Posted December 22, 2014 Share Posted December 22, 2014 Whyte and Green are capitalist con artists, taking all they can grab in a quick attack and run. For that is all they could do, with no financial back up whatsoever. Ashley "rapes" on a different level and will "ensure" that he can "rape" as hard and long as he can. For that he needs a "functional victim" and he has the means to keep it functional, Whyte and Green had not. No-one wants to become another Black-and-White Ashley harlot. For harlots live a miserable life. Yet, they live ... and that is something neither Whyte nor Green could offer. NB: Was Ashley behind Green all along? Who knows? We can speculate all day tough. for me Green was an employee of the raper utilized to facilitate the "functional victim" part as you call it. Why else would he make the largest return from Green being in charge? why else would someone approach green ask him to front a consortium, front the money then sit back and watch as green gives Ashley the keys to the vault for zero? If it looks like a rose, smells like a rose.......... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted December 22, 2014 Share Posted December 22, 2014 Whyte and Green are capitalist con artists, taking all they can grab in a quick attack and run. For that is all they could do, with no financial back up whatsoever. Ashley "rapes" on a different level and will "ensure" that he can "rape" as hard and long as he can. For that he needs a "functional victim" and he has the means to keep it functional, Whyte and Green had not. No-one wants to become another Black-and-White Ashley harlot. For harlots live a miserable life. Yet, they live ... and that is something neither Whyte nor Green could offer. NB: Was Ashley behind Green all along? Who knows? We can speculate all day tough. Quite the expert on judging characters, aren't we! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted December 22, 2014 Share Posted December 22, 2014 (edited) Quite the expert on judging characters, aren't we! Maybe it's an attempt on a World Record for the longest running online spoof character ? Edited December 22, 2014 by buster. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,247 Posted December 22, 2014 Share Posted December 22, 2014 In the Rangers soap opera we how have horticulture repeatedly featuring Are there any gardens in Berlin where holes can be dug deeper and deeper............ ............. Becoming an expert in emptyheaded nonsense, are we not? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted December 22, 2014 Share Posted December 22, 2014 Becoming an expert in emptyheaded nonsense, are we not? Not really, it's humour and it's contextual. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,247 Posted December 22, 2014 Share Posted December 22, 2014 Not really, it's humour and it's contextual. This humour has long since lost even it's banter status. No matter the smileys et al. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.