EGM poll 2 (AGAINST removals/appointments)

[Dragonfly Trumpeter 50]

I will not vote because I never contributed. Which is, imo, correct.

 

And also, the poll threads are a clusterfuck.

[Laudbertz 0]

My monkey got on the laptop before me and did the voting, that's my excuse for fooking it up on poll2 lol

 

Ohh, lol. That's a good excuse, cant be mad at a monkey.

 

...excluding the chumps that are currently in the boardroom.

[aweebluesoandso 290]

I will not vote because I never contributed. Which is, imo, correct.

 

And also, the poll threads are a clusterfuck.

 

It's a free vote DT whether you contributed or not.

[Zappa 0]

I will not vote because I never contributed. Which is, imo, correct.

 

That's your choice DT and if it makes sense to you, then it's absolutely fine.

 

FWIW, I didn't contribute to the Gersnet share purchase fund either, but Bluedell said he was keeping it open, so I voted on the basis that I do intend to contribute to it, especially if the forum fund starts buying shares direct from the market.

[andy steel 0]

It's a little worrying that even on here, the Rangers board with easily the highest proportion of professionals, sane people and generally normal posters, trying to map an obvious community opinion in poll form has degenerated into angry, frustrated swipes at accountants, uncontrollable monkeys and handwringey worries about whether it's too democratic or not.

 

I don't envy the RST and RF trying to organise their proxies!

[BrahimHemdani 1]

It's a little worrying that even on here, the Rangers board with easily the highest proportion of professionals, sane people and generally normal posters, trying to map an obvious community opinion in poll form has degenerated into angry, frustrated swipes at accountants, uncontrollable monkeys and handwringey worries about whether it's too democratic or not.

 

That would be you and WHO else, Andy?

[BrahimHemdani 1]

Perhaps a lesson has been learned here because the confusion could have been avoided if it had been possible to have FOR and AGAINST buttons beside each resolution.

 

The current system works if it is a straight multiple choice like the date of the next Gersnet Dinner, for example (now that's a thought); but not where a YES/NO is required.

 

Admin?

[Dragonfly Trumpeter 50]

That's your choice DT and if it makes sense to you, then it's absolutely fine.

 

FWIW, I didn't contribute to the Gersnet share purchase fund either, but Bluedell said he was keeping it open, so I voted on the basis that I do intend to contribute to it, especially if the forum fund starts buying shares direct from the market.

 

It absolutely makes sense to me however I do understand most site users will vote in the poll. Maybe new members should not be accepted until the vote is closed though:whistle:

 

I did purchase some shares a few weeks back mind you and will, of course, be utilising my rights with them.

[Zappa 0]

Maybe new members should not be accepted until the vote is closed though:whistle:

 

It's very unlikely that new members will sway the vote. Almost all of the 'against' votes have been from people misunderstanding how the voting has been set up.

[BlueMazza 0]

This thread is hilarious

 

Imagine Gersnet became the one lone Rangers voice wanting to keep the S***s by mistake