chilledbear 16 Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Keith Jackson Ashley is not going after the £5m in court in London or Edinburgh today. Much more likely to be an attempt to gag the RFC board. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve1872 4 Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 James Doleman @jamesdoleman 2m2 minutes ago Case before RIFC vs Sports Direct over-running, look like 11.30 time for hearing is optimistic. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Doleman no friend of Rangers btw. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve1872 4 Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 First case now over, counsel for RIFC and Sports Direct coming into court. Sports Direct have 5 people representing them, RIFC have 1 counsel for RIFC opens by telling court that there are proceedings ongoing in Scotland, asks for adjournment 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve1872 4 Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Counsel for sports direct agrees to a 5 minute adjournment until noon 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson Dynamo 128 Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 (edited) So are Sports Direct taking Rangers to court and are Rangers taking Sports Direct to court? And if both actions are by SD then why the 2-pronged action? Edited June 11, 2015 by Crimson Dynamo 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTP 0 Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 So are Sports Direct taking Rangers to court and are Rangers taking Sports Direct to court? And if both actions are by SD then why the 2-pronged action? Looks like the fat man is throwing two custard pies and hoping at least 1 sticks .............. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
raygun 0 Posted June 11, 2015 Author Share Posted June 11, 2015 A question that needs answered is why did the board keep knowledge of these actions from fans groups and the fans many of whom are shareholders, not great at all. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little General 80 Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 A question that needs answered is why did the board keep knowledge of these actions from fans groups and the fans many of whom are shareholders, not great at all. a more important question is what are sports direct hiding by trying to gag the board? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoodyBlue 0 Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 James Doleman @jamesdoleman 27s28 seconds ago Sports Direct counsel says he is seeking interim injunction to stop confidential information being releases at RFC EGM 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.