Jump to content

 

 

RIFC v Sports Direct: No contempt of court - injuction to be discussed in January


Recommended Posts

Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 24s25 seconds ago

 

Judge: How much are the costs? It's nearly £200,000 each side isn't it? SD: It probably is. Rangers: It is £300,000 for this aspect.

0 retweets 0 likes

Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 54s55 seconds ago

 

Judge: What's the cost of this exercise so far? It's nigh on £400,000 for both sides isn't it? Nods from King and co.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 32s32 seconds ago

 

Rangers clarify EGM was called to call for repayment of loan.

0 retweets 0 likes

Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 44s44 seconds ago

 

Judge: What did you call an EGM for then? Rangers point out it was called by MASH Holdings, not Sports Direct.

4 retweets 0 likes

Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 1m1 minute ago

 

Judge: It's alright for you to call an EGM for you to discuss the loan? How would that work? Mr King couldn't discuss the loan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.