RIFC v Sports Direct: No contempt of court - injuction to be discussed in January

[ian1964 10,455]

Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 23s24 seconds ago

 

Rangers: There haven't been any other meetings [between Ashley and King].

[ian1964 10,455]

Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 28s28 seconds ago

 

Judge asking for evidence of King discussing contents of the meeting in Sky Sports interview.

[buster. 4,808]

James Doleman ‏@jamesdoleman

"you've made your bed and you have to lie in it" judge tells counsel for Sports Direct

[ian1964 10,455]

James Doleman ‏@jamesdoleman 36s37 seconds ago

 

Counsel for SD says cant confirm if Ashley and King have had further meetings 'are you worried your client is going to sue you?" Judge quips

[ian1964 10,455]

Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 31s32 seconds ago

 

Judge now reading excerpts from the transcript of the King/Sky interview. "You want to put him in prison for that paragraph?

[aweebluesoandso 290]

Game over in Kings favour imo, judge is going through the motions to show SD are wasting the court time.

[ian1964 10,455]

[ian1964 10,455]

Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 58s59 seconds ago

 

Judge: What harm does [the paragraph] have?

[ian1964 10,455]

Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 24s25 seconds ago

 

SD: There has been a continuous stream of comment. Judge: But not by Mr King? SD: Yes.

0 retweets 0 likes

Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 43s44 seconds ago

 

Judge: There isn't any [harm], is there?

[ian1964 10,455]

Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 54s55 seconds ago

 

SD: The more comment there is, the more speculation there is in the press.

4 retweets 0 likes

Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 1m1 minute ago

 

SD: There has been a continuous stream of comment. Judge: But not by Mr King? SD: Yes.