Rousseau 9,381 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 The formation will stay the same (4-3-3). Miller has often played wide for us. Kranjcar is less mobile than the rest -- although Windass makes up for it -- but will be a deep-lying playmaker, with McKay, Miller, Garner and Windass to pick out. It's a strong, attacking side. As has been said, the best form of defense is attack; we must push them back by dominating the ball. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pj_1872 0 Posted September 10, 2016 Author Share Posted September 10, 2016 I think Windass sitting next to Kranjcar will be more effective. Windass will do the running that Kranjcar maybe isn't capable of. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,259 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 I think we needed to pack the MF. Doesn't lok like we're doing that. Hope it doesn't leave us open for them to attack our defence which totally lacks pace 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,259 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 I think we needed to pack the MF. Doesn't look like we're doing that. Hope it doesn't leave us open for them to attack our defence which totally lacks pace 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 Certainly a change from the days of going to Celtic Park with 5 defenders and 1 attacker. Not sure if we have enough in midfield, but we have nothing to fear today. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhunter 0 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 Certainly a change from the days of going to Celtic Park with 5 defenders and 1 attacker. Not sure if we have enough in midfield, but we have nothing to fear today. true enough if you are going to lose go down fighting. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,247 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 and kranjkar is? Well, he was never a pacy, rough and tumble player like Forrester, Windass, Holt et al. He does his talking with the ball, rather his feet. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhunter 0 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 Well, he was never a pacy, rough and tumble player like Forrester, Windass, Holt et al. He does his talking with the ball, rather his feet. I hope he's found fitness during the break but he's looked sluggish and well off it in previous games may be that MW thinks he can get us few fouls in dangerous areas just hope the game doesn't pass him by if our passing is all over the place. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFK-1 1,675 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 I hope he's found fitness during the break but he's looked sluggish and well off it in previous games may be that MW thinks he can get us few fouls in dangerous areas just hope the game doesn't pass him by if our passing is all over the place. By all accounts he looked sharper at Linfield. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,829 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 Another piss poor goal to lose, pathetic defending. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.