Big Jaws 570 Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 I'm seriously struggling to get my head round this development. What the hell is going on here? The inclusion and naming of minors in the report is utterly despicable in fact its reprehensible as they were neither there nor were they involved. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 His wife was assaulted, he stepped in to protect her, police interview him for a statement against the perpretrator and the Sun are spinning it. If he retaliated then that is taken as taking the law into your own hands and is sometimes looked on worse than the original crime. Especially if he has hit a woman When the woman was charged she may also have made a counter charge against Miller. Then again it could all be crap. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 Strange the BBC having it on Reporting Scotland they don't normally do Rangers news. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFK-1 1,671 Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 (edited) If he retaliated then that is taken as taking the law into your own hands and is sometimes looked on worse than the original crime. Especially if he has hit a woman That's fair comment but at the same time her being a woman shouldn't be seen as carte blanche to do whatever she feels like with no response in kind and I will give you an example of something that once happened to my brother to illustrate that. He was out in a club one night and ended up in some sort of spat with a woman who flew at him claws out and while he tried to protect himself with just arms up trying to defend his face his arms ended up in shreds with strips of skin hanging off. He went to the hospital to have it seen to and when the doctor there heard what had happened he said don't ever let anyone do that to you again. These are significant wounds and if anyone even a woman does this to you then you must respond with violence if need be to stop it. Edited September 23, 2016 by JFK-1 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 That's fair comment but at the same time her being a woman shouldn't be seen as carte blanche to do whatever she feels like with no response in kind and I will give you an example of something that once happened to my brother to illustrate that. He was out in a club one night and ended up in some sort of spat with a woman who flew at him claws out and while he tried to protect himself with just arms up trying to defend his face his arms ended up in shreds with strips of skin hanging off. He went to the hospital to have it seen to and when the doctor there heard what had happened he said don't ever let anyone do that to you again. These are significant wounds and if anyone even a woman does this to you then you must respond with violence if need be to stop it. I agree with that and I think the Law states you are allowed to use the minimal force necessary to protect yourself. You would be allowed to hit her but not follow up and give her a kicking. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFK-1 1,671 Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 (edited) I agree with that and I think the Law states you are allowed to use the minimal force necessary to protect yourself. You would be allowed to hit her but not follow up and give her a kicking. He was an amateur boxer capable of knocking a man out with a single punch. If he had hit her there would have been no need for a follow up. LOL And if it's true as has been suggested that the female involved was the daughter of the restaurant owner it doesn't surprise me that it was reported the restaurant replied no comment when asked for a remark. And again if it's true and I were the restaurant owner I would be more than pissed of at not just the bad publicity but this stupid bitch of a daughter assaulting a local celebrity and his wife who can only be good business for such an establishment aside from bringing in celebrity friends. Edited September 23, 2016 by JFK-1 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacK1950 2,231 Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 Everything where Rangers,their staff and so on have been the victims seems to get turned around to make them the aggressors,surely that's the correct way to go to appease all the haters and sell papers:brick::brick: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranger_syntax 3,765 Posted September 24, 2016 Share Posted September 24, 2016 He was an amateur boxer capable of knocking a man out with a single punch. How much did he weigh? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFK-1 1,671 Posted September 24, 2016 Share Posted September 24, 2016 How much did he weigh? Think he used to fight around 11 stone. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,245 Posted September 24, 2016 Share Posted September 24, 2016 Strange the BBC having it on Reporting Scotland they don't normally do Rangers news. Anything negative about Rangers will do these days ... for them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.