the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 That was the case 7 or 8 years ago, but I suspect that most have revised their opinions to an extent, given what's happened to us over the past 5 and a half years.It was still the case after admin certainly. He sill owned us 7 years ago i think. Where it is now i couldnt say for sure. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KYBear 0 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 Or, as Monty Python would say; He's NOT the Messiah, he's a very naughty boy! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,247 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 Or, as Monty Python would say;He's NOT the Messiah, he's a very naughty boy! May not sit well with some, but he's a successfull capitalist and if one thinks ANYONE of that category is without blemish, think again. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davie P 4 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 May not sit well with some, but he's a successfull capitalist and if one thinks ANYONE of that category is without blemish, think again. That's not true, what about Dermot Desmond... oh wait! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
union 0 Posted October 12, 2017 Author Share Posted October 12, 2017 looks like the party is over for dave. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 5,429 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 looks like the party is over for dave. His defence has just commenced. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
union 0 Posted October 12, 2017 Author Share Posted October 12, 2017 His defence has just commenced. he doesn't have one,first thing Judge did was disagree with his Advocate. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 What happened to "common sense" in the courts? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 5,429 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 he doesn't have one,first thing Judge did was disagree with his Advocate. He has an advocate, on his pins, positing a defence. A disagreement on a single remark by DK's man does not constitute a defeat, nor does it nullify an overall argument. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
union 0 Posted October 12, 2017 Author Share Posted October 12, 2017 He has an advocate, on his pins, positing a defence. A disagreement on a single remark by DK's man does not constitute a defeat, nor does it nullify an overall argument. his advocate is getting rag-dolled by the judge, it is becoming embarrassing as are king's advocates bizarre claims of king not understanding emails or the 30% threshhold. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.