Jump to content

 

 

[FT] Villarreal 2 - 2 Rangers (Arfield 67; Lafferty 76)


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

but the best part, for me, was Middleton's threaded pass to play through Barasic.

I thought my banging on about Middleton was vindicated last night. Changed the game. You could almost smell the fear in their full back when he came on. He is so much more of a threat than Kent as a left winger it is just frustrating for me he keeps being benched because of his age.

 

Anyway last night he's proved his doubters wrong again and surely he's going to get his first start of the season soon. Middleton and Barisic is a parternership on the left that would bring a lot of goals this season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DMAA said:

I thought my banging on about Middleton was vindicated last night. Changed the game. You could almost smell the fear in their full back when he came on. He is so much more of a threat than Kent as a left winger it is just frustrating for me he keeps being benched because of his age.

 

Anyway last night he's proved his doubters wrong again and surely he's going to get his first start of the season soon. Middleton and Barisic is a parternership on the left that would bring a lot of goals this season.

He probably deserves a start, but coming on for the last 10 minutes in games when the opponents are tired and he's tasked with taking on his Full-back is quite different from the work he'll need to put in from the start. 

 

He's still very raw, for me; he always takes on his man, which is good, but it either comes off or he loses us possession; that's fine at the death but throughout the game, perhaps he still needs to learn. 

 

I do think a start against St Johnstone would be warranted, and a decent opponent to test that side of his game. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Rousseau said:

He probably deserves a start, but coming on for the last 10 minutes in games when the opponents are tired and he's tasked with taking on his Full-back is quite different from the work he'll need to put in from the start. 

 

He's still very raw, for me; he always takes on his man, which is good, but it either comes off or he loses us possession; that's fine at the death but throughout the game, perhaps he still needs to learn. 

 

I do think a start against St Johnstone would be warranted, and a decent opponent to test that side of his game. 

Ah but you can't call him raw because he always takes on his man yet at the same time say that's what he's been tasked to do. I wouldn't say we have any reason to believe he is raw because he has been consistently effective at beating his man and creating chances for us. If he was like Sadiq and it was only coming off occasionally for him I would saw "raw" would be warranted.

 

It's true that he has an advantage coming on late, but for me the point is he is a totally different style of player and I think it's both the different style combined with his ability that has been the difference in how many chances he's created from the left wing compared to Kent.

 

In any case we're agreed he deserves a start in a home game where we are expected to be on the front foot. Those are the games where he can make his claim for a starting berth. He reminds me of Chris Burke. Chris Burke was a huge player for creating goals against your St Johnstone's and your Dundee's. Those are the games that we often didn't take 3 points from last season due to a lack of penetration and it ultimately cost us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, DMAA said:

He reminds me of Chris Burke

By the way, we've discussed modern styles vs tradtional styles before and I think Chris Burke would struggle to break through today because people don't fancy an out and out winger these days. For me the game hasn't changed as much as people say it has and fast wingers who'll beat a full back and get to the by-line will always be a full back's worst nightmare and create lots of goals.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having had a night's sleep, I still think the Spaniards weren't any better than Ufa or Maribor. They got that lucky punch early on, which visibly rattled us. Had we stopped that, they wouldn't have had it as easy in the first half. They had their chances, McGregor did his job when asked, but on the whole we didn't succumb.

 

IMHO, Worrall's first start - blooding would have been better against St. Johnstone - unless it was injury-related -  was untimely. He did well enough in the end and we did not lose the game either, but you would have expected the experienced pairing in a place like this.

 

In games like these, i.e. away from home and against sides who can play, Lafferty sure is a good option to Morelos, as he won quite a few long balls out of defence, was harrassing their defenders like mad and was running himself into the ground like there was no tomorrow.

 

Let's hope Jack gets back soonish, as he and Coulibaly plus Arfield should be in midfield in e.g. Austria. His composure was badly missed in the first half.

 

EDIT: Middleton IMHO is easily a class above Burke. Pace, trickery, an eye for a pass and willing to shoot

Edited by der Berliner
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DMAA said:

Ah but you can't call him raw because he always takes on his man yet at the same time say that's what he's been tasked to do. I wouldn't say we have any reason to believe he is raw because he has been consistently effective at beating his man and creating chances for us. If he was like Sadiq and it was only coming off occasionally for him I would saw "raw" would be warranted.

 

It's true that he has an advantage coming on late, but for me the point is he is a totally different style of player and I think it's both the different style combined with his ability that has been the difference in how many chances he's created from the left wing compared to Kent.

 

In any case we're agreed he deserves a start in a home game where we are expected to be on the front foot. Those are the games where he can make his claim for a starting berth. He reminds me of Chris Burke. Chris Burke was a huge player for creating goals against your St Johnstone's and your Dundee's. Those are the games that we often didn't take 3 points from last season due to a lack of penetration and it ultimately cost us.

True, but he can still be raw if that's all he can do; which is why that's when he comes on. 

 

I wouldn't say he's different per se, -- maybe different from what we have, or is that what you meant? -- more old fashioned. He basically always wants to take on his man; It's exciting, and it has come off, but for me, it's naive. (I felt he contributed to the capitulation at Motherwell, because he couldn't keep the ball and couldn't defend.) I'd like to see how he can keep possession, pass the ball, take up defensive positions etc.

 

To be fair, his cameo last night impressed me most because of that exquisite through ball.

 

He certainly deserves a start. I'd just like to temper the expectations; we need more than a player that can only take on a player, as exciting and refreshing as that is. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DMAA said:

By the way, we've discussed modern styles vs tradtional styles before and I think Chris Burke would struggle to break through today because people don't fancy an out and out winger these days. For me the game hasn't changed as much as people say it has and fast wingers who'll beat a full back and get to the by-line will always be a full back's worst nightmare and create lots of goals.

If you've got a player who can break lines and get in behind (note that yesterday Middleton did this with a pass) you have to nuture, encourage and develop that kind of talent.

 

However, in the modern game this type of player won't always start. As you point out, against 'lesser opposition' when defensive shape/tactical discipline isn't just as important, are the games this type of player will start.

 

We happen to have two wide players who offer the contrasting options. Kent, the more disciplined and coached player who can play an important part of a backs to the wall effort and Middleton, the more traditional direct winger.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.