Gribz 743 Posted November 3, 2007 Share Posted November 3, 2007 We all think we should be playing 4-4 fucking 2 (to quote mike Basset) but who should be out forward line? I was going to start a poll but it would mean about 762 options. I hope to see Cousin and Darcheville or Cousin, Darcheville AND Buffel. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gisabeer 409 Posted November 3, 2007 Share Posted November 3, 2007 i think boyd and novo will start today with darcheville and cousin comming on as subs. would play naismith out on the left wing with McCulloch on the right. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazza_8 233 Posted November 3, 2007 Share Posted November 3, 2007 We all think we should be playing 4-4 fucking 2 (to quote mike Basset) but who should be out forward line? I was going to start a poll but it would mean about 762 options. I hope to see Cousin and Darcheville or Cousin, Darcheville AND Buffel. But that's 3 Gribz. 3 doesn't fit into 2. :fish: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 743 Posted November 3, 2007 Author Share Posted November 3, 2007 But that's 3 Gribz. 3 doesn't fit into 2. :fish: Aye I know sir!! I want Buffel playing as the attacking midfielder!!! Black doesnt equal white - what?? :cheers: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gisabeer 409 Posted November 3, 2007 Share Posted November 3, 2007 i think boyd and novo will start today with darcheville and cousin comming on as subs. would play naismith out on the left wing with McCulloch on the right. damn i hate it when im right! (apart from naismith!) 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyk 158 Posted November 3, 2007 Share Posted November 3, 2007 We all think we should be playing 4-4 fucking 2 (to quote mike Basset) but who should be out forward line? I was going to start a poll but it would mean about 762 options. I hope to see Cousin and Darcheville or Cousin, Darcheville AND Buffel. buffel won't be playing for a while IMO and I don't see why he should 4-3-3 would do for me :devil: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted November 4, 2007 Share Posted November 4, 2007 in the spl boyd is bound to score and usually does, 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hurlock 0 Posted November 5, 2007 Share Posted November 5, 2007 The amount of strikers we have is maybe too much. Back in the hey-day Ally McCoist and Hateley were rarely kept apart or rested. Now though we have umpteen strikers and Walter still doesn't know his best front pairing or who will be the most consistant !?! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buba3d 0 Posted November 5, 2007 Share Posted November 5, 2007 I honestly think smith should play cousin and darchvile up front against barca on wednesday night, both have the face, both have the skill and both can hold the ball up to hepl each other. I mean what harm can it do? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted November 5, 2007 Share Posted November 5, 2007 We all know that we will go out in a 4-5-1 formation on Wednesday night but I am with you buba - we really have nothing to lose in this game so I would like to see WS start JCD and Cousin in a 4-4-2 and see how they get on. We aren't expected to take anything from the game and most Gers fans (Ian and Pete aside :fish: ) also don't expect us to get a result - so I would rather we went out trying to compete (which we will do no matter the formation) and be more attack-minded. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.