Bluedell

Rangers 3 - 0 Dundee

FGS Cantwell

Lundstram and Tav played well but I'm going for McCausland.

I wish I would stop forgetting to post a prediction. That's the third time this season 😡

49 minutes ago, Sutton_blows_goats said:

Some interesting questions from some oddball wanting to bunk up with James Bisgrove and give him some sleepy cuddles. 

Our very own @BrahimHemdani 😂

38 minutes ago, Bill said:

Surely Club1872 isn’t just Dave King’s plaything?🙄

It seems to be 

Looking at the percentages, it looks as if 974 people voted.

11 hours ago, Bill said:

What do these people have against Graeme Park?

The correct question is what does Dave King have against the Parks.

2 hours ago, yuddie said:

 

Chasing Sakala and wanting to sign Sima for more than we sold the former is just wild to me. That's the opposite of the trading model working well.

Did we chase Sakala? He got an incredible offer (£100K/week?) and we couldn't stand in his way. 

I'm not sure that we want to sign Sima either.

32 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

I wasn't able to see the game, but on paper it looked more of a 4-3-3 lineup, with Cantwell and Lawrence playing as free #8s? Was that how it developed, or not?

Seemed like a 4-2-3-1, with Lundstram and Lawrence as the 2, with Lundstram more of a 6 and Lawrence an 8. Cantwell was more of a 10.

Can we get the site emojis to be updated so that we get the ones you get on your phone instead of the one that the site uses? 

Or maybe it's a windows/PC issue?

I thought Lundstram and Cantwell played well. McCausland and Dessers (!) did well in bits and Sima grabbed a couple of well taken goals.

I'm going for Cantwell as he set up our 2 goals as well as looking dangerous.

2-1

Dessers

44 minutes ago, CammyF said:

Also from H&H last night apparently 

 

 

 

 

We were asked if we wanted Shankland but I didn't hear the bit about a deal being done, but may have missed it. 

13 hours ago, RANGERRAB said:

If(and it’s a big ‘if’) this is true, need to find buyers first. Won’t be easy

Given the source, it's reliable information. 

4 hours ago, Frankie said:

A packed Ibrox isn’t an easy place for any team to visit and a loud, clear backing from the stands does provide a tangible benefit to our play. That was missing last night and, as much as the players must take ownership for their own bad performances, so too must the manager.

The lack of pre-match music seemed to put a dampener of the atmosphere. We had the Butland song and that was about it.

I know some say that we shouldn't have music and let the fans build up their own atmosphere and that may work on the odd occasion, but play it by ear. Last night, we needed pre-match tunes to build up the atmosphere and it just didn't happen and the crowd was fairly flat throughout.

13 minutes ago, PoohBear said:

I am gobsmacked Lammers was kept on the field so long and Cantwell was binned in the first half. If the excuse was that Cantwell wasn't doing what he was asked to, then what fucking excuse does Lammers have?

There's a difference between playing (really) badly and not doing what you're told.

Lammers was playing in the area that he was told. The manager wanted Cantwell to play wide right to stretch them and was told that several times and he kept moving inside or coming short

1 hour ago, Sutton_blows_goats said:

Lundstram but McCausland played well too. 

 

Everyone else was utter mince bar the keeper who was isolated for the goal. Boy took it well.

You vote for Cifu, mate. 

40 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said:

McCausland took his goal well but also gave the ball away a few times.  

Yeah, I thought he'd a dreadful second half, apart from the goal.

Tav was good first half but very poor second, Davies did well in the second half, but Lundstram was our best player throughout.

2 hours ago, 26th of foot said:

I have attended the last two AGMs, both were hosted in the Clyde Auditorium(the Armadillo). The Clyde Auditorium's seated capacity is in excess of 2,000. Both AGMs were well attended, each had attendances of several hundred. I believe Edmiston House has a standing capacity of several hundred, seated will be considerably lower. Parking will also be a problem.

 

I understand the club wanting to utilise the facility; however, both elderly and infirm Rangers supporters must be recognised and standing for in excess of an hour is unacceptable. 

I'd have thought Edmiston House could take "several hundred" seated, depending on how many. 400-500 shouldn't be a problem. 

They could limit the parking around the stadium/NEH to blue badge holders and open the Albion to everyone else.

I think that they should be able to make it work. 

I agree that standing at the AGM is unacceptable.

3-1 to the Gers

Danilo