the gunslinger

the ones I am dissapointed in are ness and mccabe. its a bit unrealistic to expect Davis naisy McGregor to spend any time in the lower leagues. but ness and McCabe could have stayed and helped us recover while improving themselves.

yeah he's staying.

I wasn't at the meeting but Frankie reaconed the presentation was genuine. think he said green held it up. it just from that looks to me like they were offering sanction during the day then repeatedly telling folk at night they wouldn't accept any. I agree its a difficult one for any chairman sanctions are very clearly rediculous but the sfa very much have us by the balls. just going by those minutes it looks like sanction will be fought all the way. its also perfectly possible that standpoint changed between the two meetings on wed.

very much up to the individual as ever but I certainly wouldnt criticise anyone who takes the decision to cancel.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/rangers/9379754/Rangers-in-crisis-Friday-the-13th-could-be-particularly-unlucky-for-Ibrox-newco.html# http://www.gersnetonline.co.uk/vb/showthread.php?44574-rangers-presentation-to-spl I'm thinking the bit about not avcepting sanctions and actually its only the sanction part which is repeated a few times in fairness.

surprised no ones talking about the player numbers. as I said they suggest at least 2 of boca goian and edu are gone.

a few bits of that are rather contradictory to the document they presented to the spl.

theirs definate value in a sky boycott for rangers fans.

we should focus every penny we have on players on their way up not their way out.

must admitt I recently quit my Sunday job and was looking forward to getting the sports package for next season. I won't be getting it now.

I think theirs more to it than that. not necessarily in terms of him knowing something but I think their may well be some substance to the bid.

back on our boycott list then I hope.

quite possibly. I can't believe this is true its just to ridiculous.

similar but that was interest free and brought other benefits.

if its true and if its the same as the cva loan then yes. ticketus with more interest but longer to pay.

it sure is when it attracts interest and has repayment terms. do I get my money back if I take up his share offer?

amazing how little people learned from whyte.

especially in the face of talk of no debt and money invested. if true utterly unacceptable. ticketus mark II

unacceptable.

11 million invested. 11 million to be repaid? by us and we've to put in more before we actually own anything.

I would suggest each share gets you a vote. candidates would put themselves up for the vote. I would vote for bluedell.

ambitious club and a lovely part of the world but I thought he might do better.

I think we would do well to wait and see what Mr Brown can bring to the table. might be nothing but it might be everything.

wrong route to go. we shouldn't waste a penny on players that are past it.

and do we get 4 or 5 seats on the board if we own 50%?