RANGERRAB

King has picked a fight with someone with far greater power & wealth than he has & it is RANGERS who are suffering as a result

Spot on & if King is seen as a liability then he should consider his position as chairman. We can't afford these continual legal battles with Ashley & if King's removal stops them so be it.

Will the Herald now take action against Spiers for this fictitious story? I think we know the answer to that one

Reinstate his ban. Make it sine die

Sectarianism is an industry in Scotland which now employs otherwise unemployable people in mostly in politics & the mhedia. The slightest little incident gets blown out of proportion so as to justify the existence of these cretins most of whom have a clear anti-Rangers agenda and deliberately overlook the antics of other clubs some of which have much bigger problems than Rangers i.e. the yahoos. Until we challenge these individuals it will continue & the club must do more likewise.

Josef Stalin would be proud of this sort of thing. Welcome to Scotland 2016.

Usual nonsense from Keevins. O'Halloran is not staying with St Johnstone because a fee is involved & St Johnstone have to accept that fee regardless if it is from us or someone else. It was the same with Allan at hibz when a fee was involved he was going and hibz made sure he wasn't going to us. Their pals duly helped them out although the player(not being the brightest I wouldnt think) must wonder if he made a wise move. The days when clubs like St Johnstone & hibz could turn down six figure bids for their players are well in the past

Allan's situation was identical. He had to go only hibz didn't want to sell to us. They were rescued when their chums bought him from them despite accepting a fee far less than what Stubz said he was worth. Had they not done so they'd have had to negotiate with us no matter how much they didn't want to as a fee was involved which they wouldn't be able to turn down.

why would we sign a player we don't want?

How are we being treated differently ? Our board aren't stupid. They know St Johnstone are unable to turn down a fee for a players who's got just 18months left on his contract & won't sign a new one. What St Johnstone are trying to do is entice other bidders to get more money i.e. start an auction. It doesn't look like there are any other bidders though. It's not unlike the Scott Allan stuff at the start of the season. He had to go & Hibz eventually got £250k after Stubz told everyone Allan was a £1m player.

I wouldn't want to rely on Miller & Clark too much. That's why we need to strengthen up front

Admire your confidence but I'd expect that MW & SDoW would want to strengthen. Don't forget we lost away to both Hibz & Falkirk. That concerned me. There are still too many games still to play before we can be as confident as you seem to be

What worries me is Hibz are better up front than we are. Miller is past his best & Clark isn't good enough. That places an over reliance on Waghorn and what would happen if he got injured?

Jings whit rhag might that be?

Heard any names mentioned? Let's hope they're not youth team players this time

That is something I do not want to see happen

If we don't sign anyone else before the window closes we risk going into the play-offs again to get promotion. Say what you like about hibz but they've been strengthening their squad this month. We should be doing the same.

Are they intereested in him?

They've been downsizing year on year since we left the top division. Not surprisingly their knuckle-dragging support cannot see this.

I think O'Halloran may be signed more with next season in mind when we're hopefully in the Premiership

If we're still genuinely interested in signing O'Halloran we'll get him because St Johnstone won't be able to turn down a fee for him. Their bank won't allow it.

Nothingwrong whatsoever mate. FWIW I think O'Halloran would be a decent addition to our squad. He's got something we've not got -PACE.

On the face of it an amalgamation is a good idea but quite frankly I couldn't care less what it gets called. It's what it does and how effective it is are the criteria it should be judged on. It must not be too close to the board & be prepared to ask pertinent questions for starters like how we're going to fund playing squad improvements for our return to the top flight next season. And it should be prepared to challenge the pondlife in the mhedia and their biased reporting. It should also question the SFA & SPFL and the Rangers-hating individuals who inhabit these organisations. There are lots of benefits from this if we can use this amalgamation to speak as one voice effectively

So the RST and RF are to merge?

O'Halloran has pace to burn which would be useful next season when(hopefully) we're back in the top division