SteveC
-
Posts
5,389 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Everything posted by SteveC
-
Our keeper is briliant Go, Kelly go
-
luca's penalty saved...then we save theirs
-
what a time to buffer!
-
Either that or he has a bet on!
-
We've pushed on well at the end of the 90 mins and into extra time.
-
Gooooooal 2-2, Late equaliser! Another gift
-
bollox 2-1 them
-
Goooal 1-1. A gift in a game we were not having much joy in, but they all count
-
I've only see it since the start of the 2nd half, we're lucky only to be one down - they are ripping through our defence
-
And in double fairness, given what D Murray, Whyte, D&P, Green, Stockbridge, Mathers and Wallace have got away with - all the evidence says that we are and that we do indeed button up the back.
-
[PUBLISHED] The 120 Day Review thread - all updates and discussion here
SteveC replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Very good Alan. It's a tough morning to raise a smile, but you got one. (Can't believe you are still equivocating with "On the face of it this appears pretty damning...." but I did like this line -
[PUBLISHED] The 120 Day Review thread - all updates and discussion here
SteveC replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
It seems to be a story along the lines of Wallace knowing since January that there would be no possibility of credit card payments for season tickets but going ahead and pretending there would be and then blaming the withdrawal of this option on the UoF and King. I think Chris Graham was advising someone who asked if he could trust Wallace's word that he would know the answer to that by Monday. Story is rumoured to be in Retard tomorrow. There are claims that leakked emails are behind the story. https://mobile.twitter.com/apocryphal5 Has something on it Record front and back : https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BmGk1xVCUAAkMVb.jpg https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BmGkvk5CAAAEelC.jpg -
Yep 76' - That's enough for Halkett tonight. After two excellent goals from him to put #Rangers 3-1 up, he is replaced by Jamie Burrows
-
Your eyesight is fine: 46' - GOAL! What a start to the second half as Craig Halkett makes it 3-1 to Rangers just nine seconds after the restart in Newtongrange!
-
Ah Green, your greenly salad days. A reminder for all us to well up with gratitude to the great Yorkshireman: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2250854/Charles-Green-pledges-Ally-McCoist-10m-spend-Rangers-flotation-LSE.html
-
[PUBLISHED] The 120 Day Review thread - all updates and discussion here
SteveC replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Googled = No record of him intimidating investors and chasing them away from the club he loves -
OK, Pete, point taken but no-one was being slagged off just for supporting this board in isolation. That would be unfair. It was for supporting them in exactly the same way as they supported previous regimes that have been proven to harm our club to a near unbelievable degree. I know I can't take it anymore, so my only recorder is to refrain from posting, at the very least until the upcoming struggle for our future is decided. The next month or so will determine the next decade or so. I won't be able to resist bait under that pressure so..... 'bye for now and good luck to The Rangers.
-
Goodness gracious me, the (other) "c" word two nights in a row. With the next few weeks likely to be volatile, it may become the word "de jour". Hope your day gets better Andy, or that tomorrow is so good as to banish all memories of it
-
I thought that there was only one thing, just dressed up slightly differently depending on whoever 'the destroyer of Rangers to be defended to the hilt', is at that particular time.
-
No, which saddens me greatly. I've been very enthusiastic re RF (as I am re RST and BR) and rushed to embrace it not only for the obvious reason of believing in fan participation but because I thought it was going to be free from Rangers' fans internecine wars and bickerings. I feel deflated and very unsure now.
-
It seems clear that previous matters were behind shoredbear's reaction. His lamentable outburst being so out of proportion to the one post replied to. It must baffle any newcomers to the site. You may recall that it was not long ago I had to ask for explanations into past events that still underpin much of what is posted on the two forums I read (here and FF).
-
No, not really -but that is so much the over-riding emotion that it's pretty much all that is left
-
And yet they have willing supporters throughout our fan-base, if forums, including this one, are any reflection at all of that. They have that dimmest of the dim, DJ cheerleading them in the media...they must be thanking their lucky stars to have found such easy prey, a victim that offers little resistance and even some aid to them. I hate to say it but there's a support in Glasgow that would never have allowed what has been done/is being done to us to have happened at their club.
-
And King is a Rangers fan - none of them are. Not that being a fan makes you the best person for the job. makes you care more about what you are responsible for though, makes you less likely to torture it slowly to death merely for personal gain But, yes, the main - of various differences - is that they are on the board due to their connections with the Green and Whyte apocalypse that engulfed our club. On another thread someone complained re Green having f@ck all place in a thread about Sandy Easdale. Could hardly have a clearer place, surely.
-
Surely it is not? A half arsed compromise would leave the Spivs still steering the ship whither they wish and would consign us to even more years as also rans than we currently face.