ranger_syntax

Compare this post to Ian's commendable efforts. While Ian is taking matters into his own hands Bearman is moaning on a fan forum about undercover sectarianism and waiting for someone else to do something about it. If you pay the licence fee and have time to post in this thread then you have time to make a complaint. As you can see the BBC have to spend time handling these complaints at various levels. Think a person like Ian Small wants to spend the rest of his career dealing with complaints like this?

Well done to Ross County. This made me go back and check the winners of the cups over the last 5 seasons. A wide variety of teams are winning the knockout cups recently.

That's the best way to look at it. I don't care how much we are ignored as long as we get back to the top.

What supporters think would change if he came back and scored some goals. I would be surprised if Warburton would sign him. Isn't it funny how the same stupid topics come up every time a former player talks to the press.

Hard to believe that there is anybody who would pay to read it.

Thought that was good. Barrie McKay was great again. I don't care if he is getting picked for Scotland or not as long as we don't let him go to another club. It looked like the team lost the way between the opener and the equalizer. The only other bad point was how the number of mistakes by Tavernier. How often does he pass the ball straight to an opponent while under no pressure?

He will only be able to do that next season.

Surely some helpful small print in the Rangers First paperwork telling you how to get your money back.

The use of the word donation ensures my disinterest in further participation. I'll be interested to see what, exactly, will happen to shares in BuyRangers though. Also interested to discover if a life member of the RST has to make any contribution to Club 1872 to gain voting rights. Some good points justifying merger but the Club 1872 experiences are a bit naff and would have best been left for later.

Well, neither are gone.

That would help. I hope we don't lose any of the other eligible players to injury.

It's certainly reassuring to think that this team only lost 2-0. I wouldn't take any of those players back.

It's a good point. Throughout the season the team has shown that it can be poor defensively and also, sometimes, struggle to score. It looks like the attack has been significantly improved by the 3 players brought in. I think that we're also starting to create better chances. I think that the defence has not really improved though. We are still benefiting from keeping a lot of possession. If we manage to control possession then I think we will win it. A win would be very important as I imagine season ticket sales would get a major boost.

Not another Zelalem thread . . .

Great game. I was expecting it to be difficult but we beat them easily. At half time I thought that Dundee could still get back into it. An excellent second goal killed it. Forrester looked like he would be of little use to begin with but he's completely changed that now. Looking forward to the next round now and then maybe on to an unusual treble.

Yes, well, that is why I mentioned prospective MPs. Not sure if the public, in the UK, have ever been forced to pay for a state broadcaster though.

Good for you. I hope that more will take the time to do so.

Non payers need not worry. If someone does pay the licence then complaining to the BBC in London is certainly more beneficial than complaining on a football forum. Complaining to prospective MPs would also be worthwhile if you want to change the way that the BBC operates.

How many of you have sent a complaint to the BBC in London? I've not, but I'm not a licence fee payer.

Good stuff tonight. Hopefully we will see that for the rest of the season. I didn't really think there was much of a chance that we would get caught after the weekend. After tonight there is no chance.

There are a few SNP voters in here no doubt. Does this make anyone reconsider who to vote for?

Not sure why it is difficult to judge if it causes success but can easily judge that it isn't a hindrance. The reason I ask is that I think it is unfair for a club to have additional teams, thus additional revenue streams, in the senior league. In addition to that it warps the competition. The league competitions should be the end, not a means to an end.

To what extent is the success of Spanish football caused by having B teams playing in the lower divisions? Does it have any negative effect on Spanish football?

Can't wait.

Rangers First does that?