

Rangersitis
-
Posts
3,601 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Rangersitis
-
Union of Fans threaten Ibrox board AGM mayhem...........
Rangersitis replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
I don't, but in any case, I don't want to see anybody throwing in money willy-nilly. We need to be self-sufficient. Any investment should be directed at youth development and scouting, not signing more mediocrity for the first team. -
Union of Fans threaten Ibrox board AGM mayhem...........
Rangersitis replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
Now you are asking me for names, Rab! -
Union of Fans threaten Ibrox board AGM mayhem...........
Rangersitis replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
Did Chris also force you to open the thread, or did you not quite get the gist of the content within when reading the subtle title? -
Union of Fans threaten Ibrox board AGM mayhem...........
Rangersitis replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
Rab wants names! Whodathunkit? -
Union of Fans threaten Ibrox board AGM mayhem...........
Rangersitis replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
Pish. It is barely enough to cover the necessities for the next couple of months. They, both the club and the newspaper, omitted to say that the £3.13m figure is before costs of at least £370k are taken off. -
Apologies.
-
No, it's not, or are you talking about the DR quote?. Anything less than 75% would have seen the share issue fail and another source of funding would have been required.
-
Then I shall desist.
-
I didn't see the game, so I can't comment.
-
I was only teasing.
-
It says '3 out of 4(full stop) 25%.
-
I shall allow you to define plenty. I'm not particularly fussed if you believe me or not.
- 79 replies
-
- rangers first
- rangers fans
- (and 12 more)
-
The ones who decide not to go, are they paying customers?
-
Shut up, ffs!
-
I believe he is talking about the next one, BH.
-
Plenty of them helped. You are being extremely naive if you think otherwise.
- 79 replies
-
- rangers first
- rangers fans
- (and 12 more)
-
Have a quiet peek in the BuyRangers thread.
- 52 replies
-
- rangers finances
- rangers fans
-
(and 9 more)
Tagged with:
-
*seething inside* Only kidding, rbr.
- 79 replies
-
- rangers first
- rangers fans
- (and 12 more)
-
Fingers crossed.
- 52 replies
-
- rangers finances
- rangers fans
-
(and 9 more)
Tagged with:
-
They are certainly becoming more daring in their statements.
- 52 replies
-
- rangers finances
- rangers fans
-
(and 9 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hacked account, Admin!
-
Re-typed it all too.
- 52 replies
-
- rangers finances
- rangers fans
-
(and 9 more)
Tagged with:
-
I understand that, and my original point wasn't solely aimed at them. The RF and VB have played their part too. I am also sensitive to the fact that their members are free to act however they see fit. Those shares which were purchased today (by all three) will never get them anywhere near the goals while this current lot are still on the scene nor will they give them a significant enough number to have any real say at the AGM. From where I am standing they have merely given a struggling regime a helping hand when a foot on the throat was needed.
- 52 replies
-
- rangers finances
- rangers fans
-
(and 9 more)
Tagged with:
-
Which was? They all appear to be on the same page when it comes to their anti-board tactics.
- 52 replies
-
- rangers finances
- rangers fans
-
(and 9 more)
Tagged with:
-
On the RST specifically, I don't see the logic of calling for a boycott to starve them out, while putting money into a share issue which does the opposite. I hope they come out and explain themselves the next time their is a UoF statement.
- 52 replies
-
- rangers finances
- rangers fans
-
(and 9 more)
Tagged with: