stewarty

Along with the rest of SFL3. I'd fancy this is arguably not a promotion.

Chuck has said many times that this was something he intended to address. I'm sure once the Sports Direct deal develops and opportunities arise, this is something that will be actively considered. Patience, fellow bears!

Forget integrity for a moment. From what I've read (linked via twitter), SFL rules state that we have to be promoted in the event of league reconstruction. Precendent has been set from the mid-90's with the creation of the SPL.

Cheers, catching up now. Thoroughly enjoyed the line: "In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king".

After the liquidator's costs have been paid, that is.

Possibly, but on what conditions?

Its not been a good new year for Phil Mc20names. First his terrorist sympathising scumfucks at TAL had a pop, and now he's been told to do one by an independent complaints body!

Hypothetically, say oldco recovers this £25m. Whats the net position of monies owed assuming HMRC fail to or don't appeal FTTT's judgement?

Celtic use their Seville calculator when it comes to official attendances.

Charles Green has been remarkably quiet on this front, of late. In fact, he's had a quiet week or so. Unusual by his standards. I'm very keen to hear his thoughts on the negotiations. Is has said previously that we will not sign-over our image rights again to the SPL (via the SFL), so where does that leave any potential broadcast deals?

Out of those, only Jig and Alexander have won more than a Scottish Cup. Its the right kind of experience we need, the win-at-all-costs mentality that drags you through periods of poor form to win games when you perhaps don't deserve it.

No directly attributable quotes so not overly worried about this being anything other than a normal negotiation process. i.e. a game of offer, counter-offer, bluff and double-bluff. However, I would would be absolutely astonished if Alexander rejected our final offer if he is indeed on £10k-12k per week. Where else is he going to get anything like that kind of money? It would be a massive gamble on his part to assume that he would.

So says Facebook anyways! Many happy returns big chap.

Merry Christmas Gersnet!

The rules were pretty clear. I await the clamour for them to be changed by the usual suspects.

Stick me down for the next montrose game. With the shenanigans in the programme today, I fancy that might have an extra edge.

Haha, there's a glass half full club? Sounds a bit gay.

That wouldn't be my comment. Opinion is fine. See my previous post.

Some choose to focus on the negatives. I'll look at the positives. Everyone's a winner

Not this again *facepalm*

It is wholly owned by the group. See page 104(ish) of the IPO prospectus.

When negotiating a truce, it is normal for both parties to set out their terms. Perhaps as fans we can set out our terms. There was a good start to it on another thread: 1) Drop SPL Commission 2) Formal apology 3) Pay us the prize monies and associated funds held by the SFA/SPL (supposedly) on our behalf. Maybe then we wont be so easily agitated.

Ooft, the frothers will be getting very frothy at the sight of that!

So UEFA want regulation backed up in statute, yet wont allow football clubs to seek appropriate redress through civil courts if and when they see fit? You couldn't make this shit it up.

I think that approach would likely attract some sort of legitimate claim from United. To accept an allocation but deliberately avoid selling any tickets, would be to deprive United unfairly of the chance to sell the tickets to their own fans. In any case, I'm all for the boycott. I don't see it as something that will continue long term. This is about sending a message to the rest of Scottish football that we are back, we are stronger than you and we wont be pissed around any longer.