Rousseau

I don't disagree. I just feel he's not as dynamic as I'd like from a FB; both Devine and Yilmaz look more dynamic in the little they've played.

LB was an area we absolutely had to strengthen. We only had an out-of-form Barisic. Devine is playing out of position, remember.

For me it's because he's an average defender and his offensive output mainly consists of crosses. He's not the most dynamic. I agree he is a confidence player, and his crosses can be top class. At 30, though, I'd like to see us move on from depending on him.

Absolutely. But, Barisic is a little more one-dimensional. I'd actually prefer to see Devine get a run of games over Barisic, though.

No hype. It's just that he's a very offensive player that could be useful in MB's system which uses offensive FBs.

I'm looking forward to seeing Yilmaz at LB in this set-up.

I'm now convinced this was just the effects of the work done by SG and MB.

Just waiting on @Tannochsidebear...

I roughly counted our shots (excluding goals) on FotMob: Kent (2) Sakala (4) Lundstram (1) Kamara (1) Sands (1) Tillman (4) Tavernier (2) Morelos (3) Davis (1) Jack (3)

This. Jordan Campbell in The Athletic noticed that Jack dropped deep to make a situational back-three, which allowed us to play around their front two, and freed up our FBs. I think we were a little more aggressive in pressing too, which allowed us to prevent them from playing those long balls, protecting our fragile defence.

He's also know as 'Beni'. The club will swiftly knock that out of him...

Great debate, guys. I'll never forget where I was.

What are your thoughts, folks?

I still think we'd be remiss if we didn't make a cheeky £3.6m bid...

Good point. I was moaning at Lundstram for losing his man, and Tavernier and Tillman for not contesting when it was in their zone. The ball went almost into the 6-yard box. A 'keeper should be collecting that.

He'S ToO sLoW!

A gentle return in terms of points. Correct Result (1 pt): Everyone who entered (except compo). Correct Number of Rangers Goals (1pt): Dado, GS, Bill, WB91, Lenny, SBG, TB, Ian and buster. FGS (2 pts): - Correct Score (3 pts): - Latest Standings:

I've been happy with our work on the ball. That's not to say we've created enough, though; we've not. Defensively we've been atrocious. Lundstram at CB, though...

What a goal that was.

Why can't Sands or Lundstram meet a long ball? It's inexplicable.

Every Hibs player is in their 6-yard box. Embarrassing, both from them for playing like that and us for not being able to fashion better chances against it.

The groans from the fans is not helping.

I think we're playing OK when we've got the ball.

I don't blame Lundstram, but please take him off...

Porteous goal was a free header from a corner. Criminal marking from Lundstram. We score a good goal, then a long ball from the kick-off sees Nisbet through; Tavernear, Sands and Ludstram failing to meet the ball. Mental defending. Lundstram is not a defender.