Briton

I had a feeling we might win this one but shocked at how dominant we were. Just what the doctor ordered.

That's interesting...what's your source?

Okay sorry...another I've triggered. Okay alleged victim or complainant (as I originally said). Interesting that you don't jump on Bill who has jumped to the conclusion that publicity would have stopped this women making any complaint.

No it doesn't; it's avoiding the question with semantics. What you say is nonsense in any case. You can be a victim of a crime without there ever being a court case but let's call her the alleged victim to avoid any triggering. Could you answer the question; why would the women have been sure not to have made any complaint if she didn't have anonymity?

That's reasonable but there are very good reasons why the victim's identity is protected in these cases. So why are you sure this case would never have come to court if the complainant's identity were to be revealed?

I think I know the answer; you don't want her to 'enjoy' anonymity at this stage as the hassle she would face from the media/misogynists could likely lead to her deciding it's not worth it and to not press charges. Am I right?

Why do you think it would not have come to court if the alleged victim could not 'enjoy' anonymity?

Do you mention the Marquis of Lorne? I think his early involvement is intriguing but I've noticed that historians always seen ignore the fact that such a famous person was our patron in the very early days.

Actually I thought I was commenting in the Katic thread but when I do choose to post maybe I'll run it past you first to make sure it meets with your approval eh?

Katic has looked like a cart horse at all times recently.

Allan McGregor is another; has shown real stupidity on a couple of occasions this year in big games. He's got away with it so this experienced player in his late 30's is not considered so much a risk temperament wise as young Alfredo Morelos.

Most of the people of the world are republicans. The idea that people are repugnant because they don't want to be 'reigned over' by someone just because they are, or claim to be, the descendant of some ancient scummy war lord (no, they aren't really majestic). Get a grip.

Sorry double post.

No mention of the lack of class from Ferdinand I see; he should recieve a red card and Candeias should have his card scrubbed. On a side note did anyone see the little piece they did on Anton Ferdinand before the game? Not the sharpest pencil in the box; thick as shit in fact.

I haven't worn a poppy since poppy facism first raised it's ugly head; mind you, it's cost me a few bob extra as I still feel obliged to donate as I explain why I wont take one. Shame that people are using what was a great charity for political/tribal ends.

Even when we do, there's no class in being boastful. I thought we were decent enough last night but just lacked that bit of quality when it mattered. Says a lot though when a team like Spartak are now leaving Ibrox grateful of a point.

Actually he stated it was a honey trap.

Then, as I've already said, that's a different matter.

In relation to whether the photo of his genitals was solicited or not, you posted; 'She could have blocked him at the first message but didn't'...so if that's not excusing him then sending a knob pic, what did you mean?

So that makes it okay to send pictures of your tackle I guess. Fucks sake.

I admit I'm assuming that; my reasoning is that she is now complaining. Of course if she requested the idiot to send a picture of his tackle then that's a different matter.

So you think sending pictures of your genitals, unsolicited, to a women is okay? Should be classed as a sex offence IMO. Yes she's a victim but of course she's at fault here. Riiiight.

I don't have a problem with the Dutch or whoever getting our name wrong but I do with our own fans (and even people working for the club) being ignorant of our name. I hate the expression 'the famous Glasgow Rangers', it's a contradiction in terms. If we are so famous why do you feel you have to explain who we are by adding Glasgow to our name? The founders gave us a unique name; we are the only Rangers, all the rest have to add a qualifier; I don't see why people feel the need to change it. ( I understand the reason it's sometimes added in songs).

To think I wanted Derek McInnes to come to Rangers...dodged a bullet there.

Sadly that is not the case. Many Bears also add Glasgow to our name and I have even met some who don't realise we have never been 'Glasgow Rangers'. Last year even one of our board referred to us as Glasgow Rangers while acting in an official capacity.