Blue Moon 1,113 Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 My gut feeling is the newco asset sale will go through but the Green group will sell quickly (probably before the start of the season) to another group for £8-10million. Please God you are right, Frankie, the alternatives don't bear thinking about. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 12, 2012 Author Share Posted June 12, 2012 Green said that he had an agreement to buy all of Whyte's shares. Was he lying? Don't have a clue. I've not heard anything credible to suggest that he would still be involved in any shape or form. If it was an issue, why aren't HMRC saying that in their tweets? I guess they are in on the big conspiracy. your not really answering my questions here but I will answer yours. perhaps they didn't release all their reasons in a two line tweet. I will ask again why the secrecy over who was involved? you don't have to answer your a clever guy. you know all conspiracy theorys aren't false. what you believe like everyone else is entirely up to you. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Moon 1,113 Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 I've no desire to get involved in personality clashes but to have a go at another Rangers fan today of all days because he's stating how he feels is out of order. If you disagree with Gunslinger ignore him today isn't the day for pettiness, a big bit of our club died today for a lot of Rangers supporters. I agree 100% 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest govansw1 Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 My gut feeling is the newco asset sale will go through but the Green group will sell quickly (probably before the start of the season) to another group for £8-10million. Frankie, Do you think we the fans could raise this? Bearing in mind the pledges we made. Could the RangersUnite group be the vehicle for us? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 (edited) It appears HMRC have not ruled out the possibility of a CVA at all but just the one proposed, or am I reading that wrong? Statement on Rangers Football Club "A liquidation provides the best opportunity to protect taxpayers, by allowing the potential investigation and pursuit of possible claims against those responsible for the company’s financial affairs in recent years. A CVA would restrict the scope of such action. Moreover the liquidation route does not prejudice the proposed sale of the club. This sale can take place either through a CVA or a liquidation. So the sale is not being undermined, it simply takes a different route. Liquidation will enable a sale of the football assets to be made to a new company, thereby ensuring that football will continue at Ibrox. It also means that the new company will be free from claims or litigation in a way which would not be achievable with a CVA. Rangers can make a fresh start." http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/news/rangers.htm Edited June 12, 2012 by forlanssister 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 0 Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 Can't see where you're getting that from FS. That statement looks pretty clear. CVA or newco. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 Time for us to stick together now. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 Can't see where you're getting that from FS. That statement looks pretty clear. CVA or newco. I get it from here which appears contradictory to the rest of the statement and does not rule out a CVA. Moreover the liquidation route does not prejudice the proposed sale of the club. This sale can take place either through a CVA or a liquidation. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigy1881 79 Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 I get it from here which appears contradictory to the rest of the statement and does not rule out a CVA. That basically just says the club can still be sold on in liquidation the same as a CVA, nothing more. This is the important part of why a CVA was never being agreed. A liquidation provides the best opportunity to protect taxpayers, by allowing the potential investigation and pursuit of possible claims against those responsible for the company’s financial affairs in recent years. A CVA would restrict the scope of such action. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 Gutted and heartbroken, but i will work and do everthing in my power and finances, to help a new Rangers to emerge from the ashes. I hope the support can come together and raise the finances to buy what effectively belongs to us anyway, the club assets. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.