Blue Moon 1,118 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 If he's confident about his evidence I think he should go for it and try for a court injunction. He probably wouldn't be successful, but it would be interesting and would bring a lot more publicity to his accusations. He didn't seem so keen on an injunction tonight. That was his plan last night. He seems to be acting on the hoof. I think he has come to this late. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 as I say he needs to follow through on something. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 I think he has come to this late. Definitely and it's a real shame too. Most people seem to think he's bonkers (I know I did), but he appears to have uncovered some incredible information in a relatively short space of time. At this stage though, it sounds as if even he himself is starting to think it's too late to intervene and try to right the wrongs. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UCF2008 0 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 Just watched his latest Youtube video and he's not making much sense when he says the SPL & SFA can still create a larger SPL by admitting us and Dunfermline at this late stage. It's too late in the day for league restructuring before the season kicks off and even if it wasn't too late, the SFL would need to agree to it because their leagues would be getting restructured too. The SFL are extremely interested in league restructuring, but they won't accept it being forced upon them and rushed through as a panic SPL damage limitation measure. You're probably right. They could postpone the start of the season like the Turks did last year due to the match fixing scandal 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,288 Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 GIOVANNI DI STEFANO @DEVILSADVOKAT I now have a reply from Mr Regan directly regarding my letter of 24 July. The SFA cannot comment as there is a formal police investigation They can do quite a lot to the club though, despite that police investigation? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 They can do quite a lot to the club though, despite that police investigation? Exactly....they were able to impose fines on the club even though we were in administration - didn't think that was allowed??? I though one of the main benefits of Administration was to protect the entity against further financial penalty??? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,288 Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 Let's add this to the list. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyk 158 Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 GIOVANNI DI STEFANO @DEVILSADVOKAT The reason Rangers tickets can only be purchased by cash or check is that Visa refused to accept liability on refunds in case SFA refused 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 GIOVANNI DI STEFANO @DEVILSADVOKATThe reason Rangers tickets can only be purchased by cash or check is that Visa refused to accept liability on refunds in case SFA refused bluedell said as much the other day. makes sense. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve1872 4 Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 GIOVANNI DI STEFANO@DEVILSADVOKAT Reading the CW file seems he targeted Rangers cos he wanted to get into politics to emulate berlusconi ... Incredible 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.