the gunslinger 3,366 Posted August 9, 2012 Share Posted August 9, 2012 didn't Annan say no as they thought it should go to tender. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted August 9, 2012 Share Posted August 9, 2012 Can't imagine we are allowed to refuse them tickets. Or does it mean we have rejected away tickets for Cumbernauld? Confused. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tango 0 Posted August 9, 2012 Share Posted August 9, 2012 According to poster on RM we have refused 6000 tickets for Broadwood 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigy1881 79 Posted August 9, 2012 Share Posted August 9, 2012 According to poster on RM we have refused 6000 tickets for Broadwood if they did vote no and this is true i will laugh. I guess if they didn't want us there then the don't deserve our fans selling out their ground. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tango 0 Posted August 9, 2012 Share Posted August 9, 2012 Did Clyde not release about 3 statements, 1 stating Saracens should be in the spl before us? "Clyde added another layer of uncertainty when they claimed insufficient knowledge of Rangers newco made it "impossible" and "irresponsible" for any of the SFL clubs to consider admitting the Ibrox club into the organisation at all, never mind straight into the First Division." Both off these comments were posted on the RM thread If it was Clyde that tried to vote us out and Rangers know it then it is a great statement of intent from the club that we will take our revenge on any team that has tried to finish us 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted August 9, 2012 Share Posted August 9, 2012 RM contains the same percentage of rumour\crap as most other forums. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,419 Posted August 9, 2012 Share Posted August 9, 2012 I hope it's true that Rangers have refused tickets,if Clyde were the team to vote no?. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve1872 4 Posted August 9, 2012 Share Posted August 9, 2012 (edited) The three resolutions presented to the club are as follows:- (i) That the Scottish Football League Members agree to admit Sevco Scotland Limited as an Associate Member and agrees to permit Rangers F.C. to play in the League during Season 2012/13. In terms of Resolution 1, whether reworded or not, it seemed inconceivable to the Board of Clyde that absolutely no information whatsoever has been provided to support the resolution. This is clearly a matter of haste and again driven by an external agenda, perhaps because Sevco have not lodged an application to join the SFL then they have not submitted any information. Whilst we have accepted that this is being treated as a special case and we are willing to run with this, it simply was not possible to conclude that we could make any decision at this time. The matter is made worse because of the extent of uncertainty which hangs over Sevco. There is no need to prepare an exhaustive list of the issues as they are well publicised, however the extent of outstanding sanctions that may or may not be levied against a club which has yet to obtain SFA membership, together with the increasing number of possible commercial and legal challenges to the transactions to date simply presents a significant risk to the ability of the club to fulfil its fixtures in any league. Given that some of these matters are in the hands of the governing bodies it seems inexplicable that they are left hanging. We are clear that for the good of the game that we would want a swift and positive conclusion that would see Rangers Football Club taking part in the game again and we would wish to be able to support a Resolution that saw them entered to SFL3. However, until we receive enough information to inform such a decision then we are being pushed into a corner which would actually leave any club making a logical decision arrive at the conclusion that Resolution 1 should not be supported. The SFA could assist the process by transferring the SFA membership to Sevco prior to the Friday meeting if they have satisfied themselves of fit and proper tests and have carried out their own diligence on the viability of the club and the various legal challenges. http://www.clydefc.co.uk/news/2012/07/10/4139/ Edited August 9, 2012 by Steve1872 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annan Bear 0 Posted August 10, 2012 Share Posted August 10, 2012 Pretty sure it was Clyde 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kuznetsov 0 Posted August 10, 2012 Share Posted August 10, 2012 RM contains the same percentage of rumour\crap as most other forums. who is RM? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.