Ergatrude 0 Posted November 15, 2012 Share Posted November 15, 2012 mate that is the bampot who is obsessed with telling lies about rangers. the club are taking action against him. That is my point though, he's trying to say it's not viable to run the club, so that would suggest £5.2m is a higher estimate? Perhaps my logic is wrong 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kuznetsov 0 Posted November 15, 2012 Share Posted November 15, 2012 Celtic have 3 squads worth of players. We can't afford to try to match that.. it's ludicrous. Let them run themselves into the financial wall. We should have 1 25 man squad (pref with at least 5 homegrown youths) then another reserve team to develop players and cover injuries/suspensions when required. Paying £30m to have 2/3 full squads is absolutely mental, especially in Scotland where there is no money in the game. this is the point though, they are not doing that. they are able to sustain that size of squad. i do agree it is top heavy for scotland but that strength in depth and numbers will ensure they are stronger than everyone else and last the pace when the rest fall away. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,304 Posted November 15, 2012 Share Posted November 15, 2012 mate that is the bampot who is obsessed with telling lies about rangers. the club are taking action against him. does this dhim who writes this website actually have a paid job? if not where does he get his income from ? phil 3 names too? shouldn't this be getting investigated ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ergatrude 0 Posted November 15, 2012 Share Posted November 15, 2012 no mate, it was a play off final the year before that got them to the premier league. Cheers, I don't follow the game south of the border much, just what I see on the back pages of the papers when there aren't any old firm scandals 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kuznetsov 0 Posted November 15, 2012 Share Posted November 15, 2012 That is my point though, he's trying to say it's not viable to run the club, so that would suggest £5.2m is a higher estimate? Perhaps my logic is wrong i wouldnt read or listen to anything that bigot says mate. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kuznetsov 0 Posted November 15, 2012 Share Posted November 15, 2012 Cheers, I don't follow the game south of the border much, just what I see on the back pages of the papers when there aren't any old firm scandals rangers scandals you mean! you wont read any negative celtic stories in the papers up here mate. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ergatrude 0 Posted November 15, 2012 Share Posted November 15, 2012 first of all thats the blog thats had court action against it today by the club,. but anyway green says we are currently at 7.5 million. your estimate of 12 million is only another 8 players on 10k a week. would that win the spl. i have my doubts, I think another 8 players should be more than enough strength for us to win the SPL. I would also agree with others that this would take meticulous scouting and not just buying players based on how well-known they are which we seem to do. Celtic beat us by signing unknown gems. We sign well-known has beens who are looking for an easy ride out of football. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ergatrude 0 Posted November 15, 2012 Share Posted November 15, 2012 this is the point though, they are not doing that. they are able to sustain that size of squad. i do agree it is top heavy for scotland but that strength in depth and numbers will ensure they are stronger than everyone else and last the pace when the rest fall away. Aye, but they are lying about attendances.. who knows what else they are lying about? Didn't Lawwell say they had to cut costs last year? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted November 15, 2012 Share Posted November 15, 2012 Guess what ambition did to Macbeth. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,304 Posted November 15, 2012 Share Posted November 15, 2012 the tax payer will have to pay it. gcc are going to have it fixed before the c/wealth games come. It's not GCC's stadium. There would be an outcry the length & breadth of this country if a club got taxpayers money to do this.The opening ceremony could easily be moved. No m8 as I understand things, it's going back nearly 20 years as to how it got safety certificates in the first place. Remember the old CP with the smallish jungle ? it was small for safety reasons with entrances/exits around cemetery at rear. There was of course larger terraces behind goals.The old board said rebuilding CP would be difficult & started looking at other sites as u may recall. Then this 60,000 stadium got built, albeit on the cheap. Who approved it? say no more 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.